Are quantum gravity theories based on the existence of gravitons?

noblec04
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Are quantum gravity theories trying to progress on the assumption that there are such things as gravitons?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It seems like an odd question to me. Should it not rather be an experimental question ?
 
noblec04 said:
Are quantum gravity theories trying to progress on the assumption that there are such things as gravitons?
We had this discussion a couple of times; it depends what you mean by gravitons - and it depends which formalism of QG you are using.

One problem with gravitons is that the whole concept of particles in quantum field theory relies on a a background metric which allows you to define Fourier modes, Hilbert spaces with operators, propagators and particles. As it is expected that QG does not have such a background structure, the whole concept of particles and gravitons is expected to change.

In SUGRA you have a graviton field which is quantized and is rather close to a formalism with gauge bosons like the photon. In string theory the graviton emerges as one degree of freedom of the quantized string. In LQG the fundamental degrees of freedom are something totally different (spin networks) but it is expected that a graviton emerges as a low-energy limit of the theory, so it is not a fundamental degree of freedom.
 
I seem to notice a buildup of papers like this: Detecting single gravitons with quantum sensing. (OK, old one.) Toward graviton detection via photon-graviton quantum state conversion Is this akin to “we’re soon gonna put string theory to the test”, or are these legit? Mind, I’m not expecting anyone to read the papers and explain them to me, but if one of you educated people already have an opinion I’d like to hear it. If not please ignore me. EDIT: I strongly suspect it’s bunk but...
I'm trying to understand the relationship between the Higgs mechanism and the concept of inertia. The Higgs field gives fundamental particles their rest mass, but it doesn't seem to directly explain why a massive object resists acceleration (inertia). My question is: How does the Standard Model account for inertia? Is it simply taken as a given property of mass, or is there a deeper connection to the vacuum structure? Furthermore, how does the Higgs mechanism relate to broader concepts like...

Similar threads

Back
Top