Are the Limits of an Increasing Function the Same?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter dopey9
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Increasing
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the limits of an increasing function, specifically analyzing the behavior of the function f : [a, b] -> R as it approaches a point c from both sides. It establishes that for an increasing function, the left-hand limit as x approaches c (lim f(x) as x->c-) equals the supremum of f(x) for x in the interval [a, c), while the right-hand limit (lim f(x) as x->c+) equals the infimum of f(x) for x in the interval (c, b]. The limits are equal if the function f is continuous at the point c, as demonstrated through the example of f(x) = 0 for negative x and f(x) = 1 for non-negative x.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of increasing functions and their properties
  • Familiarity with limits in calculus
  • Knowledge of supremum and infimum concepts
  • Basic understanding of continuity in functions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of increasing functions in detail
  • Learn about the definitions and applications of supremum and infimum
  • Explore continuity and its implications on limits
  • Investigate examples of piecewise functions and their limits
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, calculus students, and anyone interested in the behavior of functions and their limits, particularly in the context of real analysis.

dopey9
Messages
31
Reaction score
0
A function f : A ->R is increasing if f(x) <= f(y) for every x, y in A such that x <= y.

Suppose that f : [a, b] -> R is increasing and that a < c < b.

i want to shat that :
lim f(x) = sup{f(x) | a <= x < c} and
x->c-

limf(x) = inf{f(x) | c < x <= b}.
x->c+

and whether these limits are the same?

can anyone help with this
 
Physics news on Phys.org
try some simple examples, like f(x)= 0 for negative x and f(x) = 1 for non negative x.
 
Define M = sup{f(x) | a <= x < c}, we prove

lim f(x) = M
x->c-

For every e>0, there exist an element a<= d < c such that

M-e < f(d) <= M

Thus, for all d < x < c, we have

M-e < f(d) <= f(x) <= M < M+e

This means

lim f(x) = M
x->c-

The second equality can be proved similarly. The two limits (left and right) are the same if the function f is continous
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
953
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
4K