Are There Metals in the Air Affected by Gravity?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Liokh
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Air Gravity Metals
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the nature of gravity as a force, its characteristics, and its effects on objects, particularly in relation to the presence of metals in the air. Participants explore various aspects of gravitational force, its implications, and related questions about attraction to celestial bodies.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the nature of gravity and whether it has subcategories, seeking documentation on the topic.
  • Another participant clarifies that gravity is one of the four fundamental forces and explains its mathematical formulation.
  • A participant notes that while there are various suspended particles in the air, metals are not significantly present.
  • There is a speculative proposal about the nature of gravity possibly having a torsion aspect and being described by a spiral-like vector force.
  • Questions arise about the effects of the sun's gravity on humans and whether weight changes throughout the day due to gravitational influences.
  • Some participants discuss the centripetal force experienced by people on Earth due to its orbit around the sun, with differing views on the significance of this force.
  • One participant expresses confusion regarding the explanation of gravitational attraction and its effects on individuals on Earth.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the nature of gravity, its effects, and the presence of metals in the air. Some questions remain unresolved, particularly regarding the implications of gravitational forces on human experience and the nature of gravitational attraction.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations in the discussion regarding assumptions about gravitational effects, the definitions of forces, and the mathematical calculations presented, which are not fully resolved.

Liokh
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
I was wondering what kind of force is the force of gravity ? Is there a subcategory of that specific force ? (Got any internet documentation about it, too ? It would be nice.)
I got another question: in the air, are there particle of metals (negligeable when studying the air's components)?

Thanks in advance for feeding my sudden thirst of knowledge :-p

(By the way is this the best forum to post these questions ?)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This really has nothing to do with Quantum Physics- unless you are asking about Quantum Gravity... but let us assume you are not. This should be in the Classical Physics or General Physics section.

I guess I don't understand what you mean by "what kind of force is the force of gravity"... please be more specific

Here is some basic information:

Gravity is one of the 4 fundamental forces of nature, which in addition to gravity includes the strong, weak and electromagnetic forces. Newton's formulation of gravity tells us that gravity is a \frac{1}{r^2} type force. That means, for instance, if we have two spherical massive bodies, the force of gravity between them falls off as one over the distance between their center of masses squared. The gravitational force is also a vector.
Scienceworld is a good site usually. Here is a link to the Newtonian Gravity section:
http://scienceworld.wolfram.com/physics/Gravity.html

General Relativity describes gravity in a very different way but I have only a rudimentary understanding of it.
hope this helps.
 
Liokh said:
I got another question: in the air, are there particle of metals (negligeable when studying the air's components)?
There are all sorts of suspended particles in air. Not much in the way of metal though.
 
Gravity itself is one of the four fundemantal forces. As a force, it has both magnitutude and direction.
 
Does this mean that if you charge a particle, which is a 1/3 spin, then it could counteract gravity, and then if you give both the eweak and strong forces a jolt, you could overengage gravity, so that it becomes less than the electromotive force?
 
Liokh said:
I was wondering what kind of force is the force of gravity ?

We don't know yet.

However it may turn out to be one of the moving mechanisms too.

Judging by the way sattellites behave it may be that gravity force has a multiple nature, i.e. it could be that the vector of the gravity force would not be described as a straight line.

Imagine a globe with a lot of lines sticking out of it, just like hair. Now spin the globe in all directions at one time (I know it's a bit hard to imagine). The lines will curve forming something alike numerous discending orbits, curving around it but finally leading to the globe itself. This is what the vector force of gravity may turn out to be. A spinning, discending to the mass all-directional spiral-like vector force.

In other words gravity field may have torsion nature.

Planets obviously stay in their orbits because the outward spinning around pull compensates for the discending factor of the gravity force.

If gravitons exist then they probably form a part of gravitational mass to mass exchange occurring in the above spin-like-spiral fashion or they may simply spin about masses causing gravitational pull. Partly the spinning approach may be supported by the idea that quarks, forming particles with masses are also supposed to have a kind of spin.

However until the exchange particle is identified, above will remain a fruit of imagination.
 
Last edited:
Thanks for the explanations !
It made me think of more questions. Sorry it's more lengthy this time :-p

If the Earth is attracted by the sun, why aren't we ?
Or are we, having a mass lighter in the day at noon than during the night at midnight?
And somewhat along Redfox's hairy vector, ( I see it clear with the head-hair example) it would mean that some days, it's easier to walk east if the sun is west of you, would it ?
Is there a way to predict(measure) the path(force/vector) of those simili-waves ?
Lastly, the gravitons you speak of would make that hair(line) tangible. Is it regroupable ? I suppose it would have some kind of nuclear power due to it's electronegativity interaction, would it ? Would that be palpable if regrouped ?
 
We are attracted to the sun, but since we're in orbit around the sun, we don't feel much of a change in weight. You would weigh very slightly more at 6:00 am and pm than at noon or midnight, essentially due to tidal effects.
 
Liokh said:
Thanks for the explanations !
If the Earth is attracted by the sun, why aren't we ?
We are, just like the Earth is. Which is why we and the Earth move together, none the wiser.

(Consider what would happen if we weren't attracted to the Sun. The Earth would move in a circle around the Sun, but we would tend to go straight (tangent to the Earth's orbit). The people on side of the Earth nearest the Sun would have their faces plowed into the ground as the Earth went in a circle while they went straight. And the people on the side of the Earth away from the Sun would almost fly off, because the Earth would move in a circle while they went straight.)
 
  • #10
DaveC426913 said:
We are, just like the Earth is. Which is why we and the Earth move together, none the wiser.

(Consider what would happen if we weren't attracted to the Sun. The Earth would move in a circle around the Sun, but we would tend to go straight (tangent to the Earth's orbit). The people on side of the Earth nearest the Sun would have their faces plowed into the ground as the Earth went in a circle while they went straight. And the people on the side of the Earth away from the Sun would almost fly off, because the Earth would move in a circle while they went straight.)

HUH? Am I missing something here... Order of magnitude calculation for centripetal force on a 100kg person:
orbital velocity \approx 10^4 \frac{m}{s}
orbital radius \approx 10^{11} m
which means the force due to our circular motion around the sun (since the Earth's radius in much smaller than the earth-sun distance) I will assume that the force on either side of the Earth will be approx. the same.

F = \frac{m v^2}{r} \approx \frac{10^2 (10^4)^2}{10^{11}} = 10^{-1} N \ll 10^3 N \approx mg

So you see we really wouldn't even notice the centripetal acceleration, let alone be thrown off the Earth by it.
 
  • #11
how about this solution: [link deleted]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #12
Norman said:
HUH?
... we really wouldn't even notice the centripetal acceleration, let alone be thrown off the Earth by it.
Well, I did say *almost* fly off. :rolleyes:

Really, I was aiming for an qualitative "ah, of course" explanation, without worrying about numbers. The poster wanted to know why we didn't fall upwards, towards the sun.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 169 ·
6
Replies
169
Views
16K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K