Are these factorial statements accurate?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Dannbr
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Factorial
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the accuracy of various factorial statements and their properties, including specific examples and generalizations. The scope includes mathematical reasoning and exploration of factorial definitions.

Discussion Character

  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant states that 6! = 6*5*4*3*2*1 is correct.
  • Another participant confirms the correctness of the statements regarding (n+2)!, (2n+2)!, and (500n+3)!, asserting they follow the factorial definition.
  • A later reply suggests that using these properties allows for simplifications, such as \(\frac{(n+2)!}{n!} = (n+1)(n+2)\).
  • Another participant proposes a generalization: \(\frac{(n+a)!}{n!}=\prod_{i=1}^a n+i\).

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the correctness of the factorial statements presented, but there is no explicit consensus on the implications or applications of these properties.

Contextual Notes

The discussion does not address potential limitations or assumptions underlying the factorial definitions or the generalizations proposed.

Dannbr
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
so,

6! = 6*5*4*3*2*1

(n+2)! = (n+2)(n+1)(n)!

(2n+2)! = (2n+2)(2n+1)(2n)!

(500n+3)! = (500n+3)(500n+2)(500n+1)(500n)!

Are all these statements correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Dannbr said:
so,

6! = 6*5*4*3*2*1

(n+2)! = (n+2)(n+1)(n)!

(2n+2)! = (2n+2)(2n+1)(2n)!

(500n+3)! = (500n+3)(500n+2)(500n+1)(500n)!

Are all these statements correct?

Yes.
 
Dannbr said:
so,

6! = 6*5*4*3*2*1

(n+2)! = (n+2)(n+1)(n)!

(2n+2)! = (2n+2)(2n+1)(2n)!

(500n+3)! = (500n+3)(500n+2)(500n+1)(500n)!

Are all these statements correct?

Yes. Using these properties can allow you to simplify something like:

[tex]\frac{(n+2)!}{n!} = (n+1)(n+2)[/tex]
 
You could generalize to get [tex]\frac{(n+a)!}{n!}=\prod_{i=1}^a n+i[/tex]
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K