Are these torques correct for a simple balancing/fulcrum exp

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a static equilibrium experiment involving torques calculated from weights placed on a ruler balanced on a fulcrum. Participants are examining the correctness of the recorded torques based on the forces and distances involved.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the calculation of torque as the product of force and distance from the fulcrum. Questions arise regarding the accuracy of recorded weights and dimensions, with some participants suggesting potential errors in the data.

Discussion Status

There is active engagement with participants confirming the method of calculating torque and questioning the accuracy of specific weight measurements. Multiple interpretations of the data are being explored, with suggestions for re-evaluating the recorded values.

Contextual Notes

Participants are addressing potential discrepancies in the weights used in the experiment, noting specific values that may have been misrecorded. The discussion is framed within the constraints of a homework assignment, where accuracy in measurements is critical.

Robert Parsons
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


For my physics lab, they had us do a simple static equilibrium experiment where we rested a ruler on a fulcrum (at its center of mass) and then attached varying amounts of weight on either end at different distances from the fulcrum. This screenshot is the data we recorded (F1 is the weight of Mass 1 in Newtons, and the same for F2):

Untitled_2.jpg


Homework Equations


I believe the torque is supposed to be calculated by multiplying the magnitude of the force by the distance from the fulcrum, correct? And if that's right, then shouldn't the two torques cancel out since the ruler was balanced when the weights were added to it? Any help would be very much appreciated! Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Robert Parsons said:
I believe the torque is supposed to be calculated by multiplying the magnitude of the force by the distance from the fulcrum, correct?

Correct.

And if that's right, then shouldn't the two torques cancel out since the ruler was balanced when the weights were added to it?

Correct. My guess is you wrote down a weight or dimension incorrectly or made a calculating error somewhere.
 
Are you sure about the 5.2N? That's a 53g mass. I'll bet it was 50g.
 
I think you meant 530g and 500g but good call.
 
CWatters said:
I think you meant 530g and 500g but good call.
Thanks, well spotted.
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
10K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
19K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
5K