I Are vectors independent of reference frames?

TonyEsposito

Ok, this is the notation im going to use in this thread: uppercase means vectors, while "[V]c" means coordinates of vector V in frame c.
I'm reading from a book: i have a reference frame "a" and a reference frame "b" rotated with respect to "a", the vector connecting the frames origin is R.
We are tracking a particle having radius vector X in frame a and X' in frame b, the book says that the relation connecting the two vector is:

X=R+Q.V'
where Q is the rotation tensor of the two frames...but arent vectors indipendent of frames? should not the relation be simply:

X=R+V'

and only when expressed in a coordinates Q comes into play?

[X]a=[R]a+Q.[V']b
[X]b=[R]b+Q^-1.[V']a

Last edited by a moderator:
Related Classical Physics News on Phys.org

member659127

but arent vectors indipendent of frames?
They are... But their components are not. If you rotate or stretch or shrink or deform your coordinate frame the components change which what those tensors are used for.

FactChecker

Gold Member
2018 Award
I agree, as long as the term "vector" is interpreted in the physics/tensor context. In a pure mathematical context, it is possible to call something a "vector" where it does not transform as a tensor would. (A mathematician might define something like (1,0) as a unit "vector" even though it does not transform at all.)

"Are vectors independent of reference frames?"

Physics Forums Values

We Value Quality
• Topics based on mainstream science
• Proper English grammar and spelling
We Value Civility
• Positive and compassionate attitudes
• Patience while debating
We Value Productivity
• Disciplined to remain on-topic
• Recognition of own weaknesses
• Solo and co-op problem solving