Are x, y, and z elements of the normed linear space ℓ∞(ℝ)?

  • Thread starter Thread starter bugatti79
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Linear Space
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the elements x, y, and z in the normed linear space ℓ∞(ℝ). It is established that x = (n-1)/n and y = 1/n are elements of ℓ∞(ℝ) as they are bounded above, while z = 2^n is not an element due to being unbounded. The calculations for x + y and 2^(1/2)y reveal that both results are not in ℓ∞(ℝ). The infinity norms are calculated, confirming that ||x||∞ = 1, ||y||∞ = 1, and ||x+y||∞ = 1, while ||2^(1/2)y||∞ is also determined to be 1.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of normed linear spaces, specifically ℓ∞(ℝ)
  • Familiarity with sequences and their properties
  • Knowledge of the concept of boundedness in mathematical analysis
  • Ability to compute limits and supremums in sequences
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of normed linear spaces, focusing on ℓ∞ spaces
  • Learn how to compute the supremum of sequences
  • Explore the concept of bounded and unbounded sequences in functional analysis
  • Investigate the implications of the infinity norm in various mathematical contexts
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, particularly those studying functional analysis, as well as educators and researchers interested in normed linear spaces and sequence properties.

bugatti79
Messages
786
Reaction score
4

Homework Statement



Consider the normed linear space \ell_\infty \mathbb({R}). Let x= \frac{n-1}{n}, y=(1/n) and z=2^n

a) Are x,y,z each in \ell_\infty \mathbb({R})

b) What is x+y? What is 2^{1/2} y?

c) Calculate ||x||_\infty, ||y||_\infty, ||x+y||_\infty and ||2^{1/2} y ||_\infty

For a) Does that mean are x,y,z subspaces of \ell_\infty \mathbb({R})?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
bugatti79 said:

Homework Statement



Consider the normed linear space \ell_\infty \mathbb({R}). Let x= \frac{n-1}{n}, y=(1/n) and z=2^n

a) Are x,y,z each in \ell_\infty \mathbb({R})

b) What is x+y? What is 2^{1/2} y?

c) Calculate ||x||_\infty, ||y||_\infty, ||x+y||_\infty and ||2^{1/2} y ||_\infty

For a) Does that mean are x,y,z subspaces of \ell_\infty \mathbb({R})?
No, x, y, and z are sequences. The question is asking whether they belong to \ell_\infty \mathbb({R}).
 
x and y are each an element in l_∞ as they are bounded above

z is NOT an element as its not bounded above

In b) what does it mean by 'what is'. Is that asking to evaluate?
 
You could answer b by evaluating x + y, and then saying whether it is in l(R).
 
bugatti79 said:
1. Homework Statement

b) What is x+y? What is 2^{1/2} y?



x+y =n implies (n) =(1,2,3,4...) which is not in l∞(R) sicne it is not bounded above.

2^(1/2)*y= 2^(n+1/2) which is not in l∞(R) either...?
 
bugatti79 said:
x+y =n implies (n) =(1,2,3,4...) which is not in l∞(R) sicne it is not bounded above.
Yes, but here's how to say the first part better. x + y = {n} = {1, 2, 3, ...}
bugatti79 said:
2^(1/2)*y= 2^(n+1/2) which is not in l∞(R) either...?
No, 21/2y = 21/2{1/n}. That means 21/2 times each element of the sequence {1/n}.
 
Mark44 said:
No, 21/2y = 21/2{1/n}. That means 21/2 times each element of the sequence {1/n}.

Thanks..that was a mistake on my part. So hence it IS in l∞(R)

For c) do I attempt to evaluate each?
 
Yes and yes.
Your textbook should have a definition of the infinity norm - if not, there's one in the link I posted in the other thread.
 
Hmm, I get a different result for x+y... :confused:
 
  • #10
I like Serena said:
Hmm, I get a different result for x+y... :confused:

Mark44 said:
Yes, but here's how to say the first part better. x + y = {n} = {1, 2, 3, ...}


Let's make that x + y = {1} = {1, 1, 1, ...}
 
  • #11
bugatti79 said:

Homework Statement



Consider the normed linear space \ell_\infty \mathbb({R}). Let x= \frac{n-1}{n}, y=(1/n) and z=2^n

c) Calculate ||x||_\infty, ||y||_\infty, ||x+y||_\infty and ||2^{1/2} y ||_\infty

For x:

1-1/n =(0,1/2,2/3,3/4...) and is bounded.

||1-1/n||_∞=...? I am not sure how to calculate this. If some one can illustrate this one, I can try the others...? I know ||1-1/n||_∞=sup |x_n| but don't know how to calculate |x_n|

Thanks
 
  • #13
Mark44 said:
See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lp_space, in the section titled Lp spaces, starting with "One also defines the ∞-norm as ...".

I believe that this is the norm to be used in your problem.

THanks Mark but how to I evalute |x_n|?
 
  • #14
What is the supremum of the set {0, 1/2, 2/3, 3/4, ..., n/(n + 1), ...}?
 
  • #15
Mark44 said:
What is the supremum of the set {0, 1/2, 2/3, 3/4, ..., n/(n + 1), ...}?

I think the supremum is the smallest real number that is greater than or equal to every number in the set, hence t must be 0...?

What do i do next?

Is it something along the lines of

|1-1/n|=\sqrt{(1-1/n)^2}=0 where n=1
 
Last edited:
  • #16
bugatti79 said:
I think the supremum is the smallest real number that is greater than or equal to every number in the set,
Yes.
bugatti79 said:
hence t must be 0...?
No. 0 is smaller than, not larger than every number in the sequence except the first.
bugatti79 said:
What do i do next?

Is it something along the lines of

|1-1/n|=\sqrt{(1-1/n)^2}=0 where n=1
 
  • #17
Mark44 said:
Yes.No. 0 is smaller than, not larger than every number in the sequence except the first.
Then it doesn't exist, there is no sup...?
 
  • #18
bugatti79 said:
I think the supremum is the smallest real number that is greater than or equal to every number in the set
Yes! So what is the smallest number that is >= each number in the sequence {0, 1/2, 2/3, 3/4, ..., n/(n+1), ...}
bugatti79 said:
, hence t must be 0...?
No, it can't be 0. This number is too small, because it's not larger than 1/2 (for example). 2589 is larger than all the numbers in the sequence, but can you find one that is not so large?
 
  • #19
Mark44 said:
Yes! So what is the smallest number that is >= each number in the sequence {0, 1/2, 2/3, 3/4, ..., n/(n+1), ...}
No, it can't be 0. This number is too small, because it's not larger than 1/2 (for example). 2589 is larger than all the numbers in the sequence, but can you find one that is not so large?

1 would be greater than or equal to every number in the set...?
 
  • #20
bugatti79 said:
1 would be greater than or equal to every number in the set...?

a reasonable guess, can you prove it?
 
  • #21
bugatti79 said:
1 would be greater than or equal to every number in the set...?
Yes. Why are you uncertain?

Deveno said:
a reasonable guess, can you prove it?
Although not required in the problem, Deveno's question is reasonable, given the uncertainty in the answer above.
 
  • #22
Mark44 said:
Yes. Why are you uncertain?

Although not required in the problem, Deveno's question is reasonable, given the uncertainty in the answer above.

All I know is that |1- 1/n| < 1 but I don't know to prove its 1.
 
  • #23
|1 - 1/n| is never 1.

but...perhaps there might be a least upper bound. what are our likely candidates for this office?
 
  • #24
What is:
\lim\limits_{n \to \infty} (1 - {1 \over n})
 
  • #25
I like Serena said:
What is:
\lim\limits_{n \to \infty} (1 - {1 \over n})

IF n tends to infinity then the modulus tends to 1 but never 1...so does that mean that
||1- 1/n||_∞=sup |1-1/n|=1?
 
  • #26
I don't understand your uncertainty either.

I'm just going to say yes, it is 1.
 
  • #27
bugatti79 said:
IF n tends to infinity then the modulus tends to 1 but never 1...so does that mean that
||1- 1/n||_∞=sup |1-1/n|=1?

what does:
\lim_{n \to \infty} f(n) = L
mean?

if you have such a limit, and, you know that f(n) < L for all n, what must sup{f(n)} be?
 
  • #28
Deveno said:
what does:
\lim_{n \to \infty} f(n) = L
mean?

if you have such a limit, and, you know that f(n) < L for all n, what must sup{f(n)} be?

That L is a finte real number and in this case it is a 1.
 
  • #29
Deveno said:
what does:
\lim_{n \to \infty} f(n) = L
mean?

if you have such a limit, and, you know that f(n) < L for all n, what must sup{f(n)} be?

bugatti79 said:
That L is a finte real number and in this case it is a 1.
You didn't answer Deveno's question. He asked, what is sup{f(n)}?
 
  • #30
Mark44 said:
You didn't answer Deveno's question. He asked, what is sup{f(n)}?

Is it L?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K