MHB Area of multiple circles inside a rectangle

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the area of six identical circles with a radius of 24 cm, arranged within a rectangle. The circles touch at least two others and align with the perimeter of a triangle, with the triangle's height calculated as approximately 83.14 cm. The area of the rectangle is estimated at about 18,883.94 cm², while the total area of the six circles is approximately 10,857.34 cm². This results in the area of the circles constituting around 57.50% of the rectangle's area. The calculations were confirmed, noting minor discrepancies in decimal precision.
Help seeker
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
Figure shows six identical circles inside a rectangle.
ScreenShot_20210317093706.png

The radius of each circle is 24 cm. The radius of the circles is the greatest possible radius so that the circles fit inside the rectangle. The six circles form the pattern shown in Figure so that
• each circle touches at least two other circles
• the circle in the top row of the pattern and the circles in the bottom row of the pattern touch at least one side of the rectangle
• the centres of the circles all lie on the perimeter of a single triangle.

Find the total area of the $six$ $circles$ $as$ $a$ $percentage$ $of$ $the$ $area$ $of$ $the$ $rectangle$.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Height of triangle = √(96²-48²) ≈ 83.1384387633 cm
Area of rectangle ≈ 144×(83.1384387633+48) ≈ 18883.9351819 cm²
Area of 6 circles ≈ 10857.34422 cm²
Area of 6 circles as a percentage of area of rectangle ≈ 57.49513603 %
 
phymat said:
Height of triangle = √(96²-48²) ≈ 83.1384387633 cm
Area of rectangle ≈ 144×(83.1384387633+48) ≈ 18883.9351819 cm²
Area of 6 circles ≈ 10857.3442$${\color{red}2}$$ cm²
Area of 6 circles as a percentage of area of rectangle ≈ 57.49513$${\color{red}603}$$ %
Minor oversight or calculator algorithm difference.
Those might have been
Area of 6 circles ≈ 10857.3442108
and
Area of 6 circles as a percentage of area of rectangle ≈ 57.4951359778
 
Tnx
Solved
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top