Area of portion of this figure

  • Thread starter Thread starter maan143
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Area Figure
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the area of a specific portion of a parabolic figure. The user seeks clarification on the methods used in a referenced video, questioning why a particular formula involving 1/3 is preferred over 1/6 for area calculation. Participants emphasize the importance of understanding the vertex's role in the problem and the need for clear visual aids. The user aims to simplify the problem for better comprehension. Overall, the conversation focuses on resolving the area calculation through collaborative input.
Mathematics news on Phys.org
welcome to pf!

hi maan143! welcome to pf! :wink:

Show us what you've tried, and where you're stuck, and then we'll know how to help! :smile:
 
Is the point A supposed to be the vertex? If not, the problem is unworkable and if so the picture should show a slope of 0 at A.
 
Thanx. for ur replies.

mmm... actually I wanted to make it as simple as possible, so I drew this figure for easy understanding of the prob.

okay! here's the link, www.youtube.com/watch?v=zVKf6hZfrhA&feature=related

just seek upto 25:24
why did he take 1/3 * 0.45fck * 0.57x
Why not 1/6 * 0.45fck * 0.57x

where, 0.45fck = 5 (in previous thread figure)
0.57x = 6 (in previous thread figure)
0.43x = 4 (in previous thread figure)and don't worry (consider) 'b' in the youtube video, coz we are considering only area (2-D)Now did I make the prob. clear to you guys and let me know, if I didn't .

Thanx. again.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Back
Top