Area surface of revolution (rotating this astroid curve around the x-axis)

SomeBody
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
Calculate the area of the surface of revolution obtained by rotating the following astroid curve around the x-axis:
Relevant Equations
x=a cos³(t),
y= a sin³(t)
Hello,

I am studying arc lengths and areas for parametric curves from the Adams & Essex Calculus book and I am a bit baffled by example 2 in the image attached. I understand the solution in the book where they integrate from t=0 to t=pi/2 (first quadrant) and multiply by two to get the full area.

However I tried to solve the exercise by integrating from t=0 to t=pi and get 0 as a result. How is this possible that the first and second quadrant cancel each other out by taking the integral over both?
- the arclength is positive for the whole interval t=0 to t=pi
- dt is positive for the whole interval t=0 to t=pi
- y = a sin³(t) is positive for the whole interval t=0 to t=pi
So the integral for the second quadrant is an infinite sum of positive terms but the integral from t=p/2 to t=pi is the negative opposite from the first quadrant. How is that possible?
1741731828312.png
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I am not sure exactly what you calculated, but integrals are oriented volumes. It can easily happen that one part is right-handed and the other one left-handed, resulting in zero.
 
If you extend to ##t \in (0,\pi)## then ##\sqrt{\cos^2 t} = |\cos t|##, which is not equal to ##\cos t## for ##t > \pi/2##.

The cosine becomes negative.

Edit: So yes, the arc length should be positive, but the expression in the example is not. The author has used that ##t < \pi/2## to move the cosine outside the square root without the absolute value.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top