Area surface of revolution (rotating this astroid curve around the x-axis)

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the area of a surface of revolution for an astroid curve by integrating over the interval from t=0 to t=π. The original solution in the Adams & Essex Calculus book integrates from t=0 to t=π/2 and doubles the result to account for symmetry, while the user finds that integrating from t=0 to t=π yields zero due to the cosine function becoming negative in the second quadrant. This leads to confusion about how the integral can cancel out when both quadrants contribute positive terms. It is clarified that the integral's orientation affects the outcome, as the cosine's sign changes after π/2, resulting in a negative contribution from the second quadrant. The discussion concludes that the author’s approach assumes t < π/2 to simplify the expression without considering the absolute value of cosine.
SomeBody
Messages
3
Reaction score
3
Homework Statement
Calculate the area of the surface of revolution obtained by rotating the following astroid curve around the x-axis:
Relevant Equations
x=a cos³(t),
y= a sin³(t)
Hello,

I am studying arc lengths and areas for parametric curves from the Adams & Essex Calculus book and I am a bit baffled by example 2 in the image attached. I understand the solution in the book where they integrate from t=0 to t=pi/2 (first quadrant) and multiply by two to get the full area.

However I tried to solve the exercise by integrating from t=0 to t=pi and get 0 as a result. How is this possible that the first and second quadrant cancel each other out by taking the integral over both?
- the arclength is positive for the whole interval t=0 to t=pi
- dt is positive for the whole interval t=0 to t=pi
- y = a sin³(t) is positive for the whole interval t=0 to t=pi
So the integral for the second quadrant is an infinite sum of positive terms but the integral from t=p/2 to t=pi is the negative opposite from the first quadrant. How is that possible?
1741731828312.png
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I am not sure exactly what you calculated, but integrals are oriented volumes. It can easily happen that one part is right-handed and the other one left-handed, resulting in zero.
 
If you extend to ##t \in (0,\pi)## then ##\sqrt{\cos^2 t} = |\cos t|##, which is not equal to ##\cos t## for ##t > \pi/2##.

The cosine becomes negative.

Edit: So yes, the arc length should be positive, but the expression in the example is not. The author has used that ##t < \pi/2## to move the cosine outside the square root without the absolute value.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K