Undergrad Why Does the Area Under a Diffraction Curve Equal This Value?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The area under the diffraction curve defined by the function f(θ) = (I₀sin²(nθ/2))/(sin²(θ/2)) evaluates to (2πnI₀) over a cycle from 0 to 2π. This value corresponds to (Iₘₐₓ + Iₘᵢₙ)/2, confirming that Iₘₐₓ equals 4πnI₀ when Iₘᵢₙ is zero. The maximum intensity Iₘₐₓ occurs periodically when both the numerator and denominator approach zero, specifically at the limit where θ/2 approaches mπ. The discussion also notes that the phase φ is commonly used in diffraction theory integrals for N slits, where φ = (2πd sin(θ))/λ.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of diffraction theory and its mathematical representations.
  • Familiarity with trigonometric functions and their properties.
  • Knowledge of integral calculus, specifically evaluating definite integrals.
  • Basic concepts of wave physics, including wavelength (λ) and slit separation (d).
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the mathematical derivation of diffraction patterns in multi-slit experiments.
  • Explore the use of phase φ in diffraction theory and its implications on intensity calculations.
  • Study the properties of sine functions in relation to wave interference patterns.
  • Learn about the conditions for maximum and minimum intensity in diffraction scenarios.
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, optical engineers, and students studying wave optics or diffraction phenomena will benefit from this discussion, particularly those interested in mathematical modeling of light behavior through slits.

albertrichardf
Messages
165
Reaction score
11
Hi,
consider the following curve:
f(\theta) = \frac {I_0sin^2(n\theta/2)}{sin^2(\theta/2)}

When the area over a cycle from ##0## to ##2π## is evaluated it gives ##(2πnI_0)##. This is exactly ##\frac {I_{max} + I_{min}}{2}## , since
##I_{min}## is ##0##. Is this a coincidence, or is there a reason behind the area under the curve is the same as this value?
Thank you for your answers.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Does this mean that ##I_{max} = 4\pi n I_0## all the time? If so, then that would be all the coincidence needed.
 
## I_{max}=n^2 I_o ##. The maximum occurs periodically when both the numerator and denominator equal (i.e. approach) zero. This is in the limit ## \frac{\theta}{2} \rightarrow m \pi ##. I don't know if you have the integral evaluated correctly for a single cycle. I would need to try to look that one up. I don't even know that it has a simple closed form. ## \\ ## Usually the letter ## \phi ## is used instead of ## \theta ## in this diffraction theory integral for ##N ## slits, where the phase ## \phi=\frac{2 \pi d \sin{\theta}}{\lambda} ##, and the ## N ## is designated with a capital letter.
 
Last edited:
Relativistic Momentum, Mass, and Energy Momentum and mass (...), the classic equations for conserving momentum and energy are not adequate for the analysis of high-speed collisions. (...) The momentum of a particle moving with velocity ##v## is given by $$p=\cfrac{mv}{\sqrt{1-(v^2/c^2)}}\qquad{R-10}$$ ENERGY In relativistic mechanics, as in classic mechanics, the net force on a particle is equal to the time rate of change of the momentum of the particle. Considering one-dimensional...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K