Arfken, parity operation on a point in polar coordinates

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
6 replies · 5K views
Clever-Name
Messages
378
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Show that the parity operation (reflection through the origin) on a point [itex](\rho, \varphi, z)[/itex] relative to fixed (x, y, z) axes consists of the transformation:
[tex]\rho \to \rho[/tex]
[tex]\varphi \to \varphi \pm \pi[/tex]
[tex]z \to -z[/tex]

Also, show that the unit vectors of the cylindrical polar coordinate system [itex]\hat{e}_{\rho}[/itex] and [itex]\hat{e}_{\phi}[/itex] have odd parity while [itex]\hat{e}_{z}[/itex] has even parity

Homework Equations


Not sure

The Attempt at a Solution



All I know about Parity is it's definition. I know that for a vector (x,y,z) if you apply the parity operator you get (-x,-y,-z). So I thought maybe if you take the coordinates [itex](\rho, \varphi, z)[/itex] and write it as:
[tex]\rho = \sqrt{x^{2} + y^{2}}[/tex]
[tex]\varphi = arctan(\frac{y}{x})[/tex]
[tex]z = z[/tex]

And apply what I know about Parity I would get:

[tex]\rho' = \sqrt{(-x)^{2} + (-y)^{2}} = \rho[/tex]
[tex]\varphi' = arctan(\frac{-y}{-x}) = \arctan(\frac{y}{x}) = \varphi[/tex]
[tex]z' = -z[/tex]

Now I realize the definition of [itex]\varphi[/itex] depends on the x and y values, so I suppose I could reason that it should be [itex]\varphi \pm \pi[/itex] based on that, but I'm uncomfortable just outright stating it. I feel like there should be more to it.I haven't attempted the last part yet.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm not sure I follow...

For [itex]z \to -z[/itex] it's obvious.

For [itex]\rho \to \rho[/itex] there is no restriction on the sign of x or y so I supposed this could imply [itex]x \to -x[/itex] and [itex]y \to -y[/itex] but I'm not sure how I could definitively state that.

and for [itex]\phi \to \phi \pm \pi[/itex] I'm completely lost as to how to approach it.

edit - for [itex]\phi[/itex] would it be appropriate to look at the angle in the 4 quadrants and add/subtract pi to see how this changes the x and y value according to quadrant?
 
Ok so if

[itex]x = \rho cos(\phi)[/itex]
and
[itex]y = \rho sin(\phi)[/itex]

and we take [itex]\phi \to \phi + \pi[/itex]
we get
[itex]x = \rho cos(\phi + \pi) = \rho (-cos(\phi)) = -x[/itex]
and
[itex]y = \rho sin(\phi + \pi) = \rho (-sin(\phi)) = -y[/itex]

and the same follows for negative pi.

This is a sufficient way to answer the problem? To 'work backwards' in a sense?
 
Oh alright, perfect, thank you. Now the last part should then fall out as follows:

Since the unit vectors are defined as:

[tex]\hat{e}_{\rho} = [cos(\phi), sin(\phi), 0][/tex]
[tex]\hat{e}_{\phi} = [-sin(\phi), cos(\phi), 0][/tex]
[tex]\hat{e}_{z} = [0,0,1][/tex]

Applying the operation [itex]\phi \to \phi \pm \pi[/itex] gives us:
[tex]\hat{e}_{\rho} = [cos(\phi), sin(\phi), 0] \to [-cos(\phi), -sin(\phi), 0] = -\hat{e}_{\rho}[/tex]
[tex]\hat{e}_{\phi} = [-sin(\phi), cos(\phi), 0] \to [sin(\phi), -cos(\phi), 0] = -\hat{e}_{\phi}[/tex]
[tex]\hat{e}_{z} = [0,0,1] \to [0, 0, 1] = \hat{e}_{z}[/tex]

Since the z unit vector didn't change it has even parity, and since the other 2 changed in sign they have odd parity.

I just wanted to post the rest of the solution for anyone else who might come across this problem.