How to Calculate the Mass of a Calcium Atom in Kilograms?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The mass of a calcium atom can be calculated using two methods. The first method involves converting atomic mass units (amu) directly to kilograms using the conversion factor of 1.00 amu = 1.66 x 10^-24 g. This results in a mass of 6.6566 x 10^-26 kg for calcium, which has an atomic mass of 40.1 amu. The second method utilizes Avogadro's number (6.02 x 10^23 atoms/mol) to convert grams per mole to kilograms per atom, yielding a mass of 6.6578 x 10^-26 kg/atom. Both methods are valid, but the second method is preferred for its ease of remembering Avogadro's number.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of atomic mass units (amu)
  • Familiarity with Avogadro's number (6.02 x 10^23)
  • Basic knowledge of unit conversion between grams and kilograms
  • Ability to perform dimensional analysis in calculations
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the concept of atomic mass and its significance in chemistry
  • Learn about Avogadro's number and its applications in mole calculations
  • Explore dimensional analysis techniques for unit conversions
  • Investigate the differences between amu and grams in scientific calculations
USEFUL FOR

Chemistry students, educators, and anyone interested in understanding atomic mass calculations and unit conversions in scientific contexts.

Andrew321
ok, I'm trying to get the mass of a calcium atom in kilograms...formula for converting atoms to grams is(1.00amu=1.66x10^-24g)Calcium is 40.1amu
Ok, here is the setup with it..
40.1amu/1 x 1.66x10^-24g/1.00amu x 1kg/1,000g= ...
So how am i suposed to get the answer? Could someone please put the answer our step by step for me? Thanks a bunch:smile:

Andrew
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
The main thing is to get the units to work out.

40.1amu * 1.66x10^-24g/amu * 1kg/1000g = 6.6566x10^-26kg

The way we did questions like this at my school was like this:
40.08g/mol * 1mol/6.02x10^23atoms * 1kg/1000g = 6.6578x10^-26kg/atom

Both ways work but I personally like the second way better. 6.02x10^23 is avogadro's number which is fairly easy to remember since you see it a lot. That 1.66x10^-24 is 1 over avogadro's number which does the same thing in both equations but it just makes it so you need to remember another number (not a good thing).
 
I came.across a headline and read some of the article, so I was curious. Scientists discover that gold is a 'reactive metal' by accidentally creating a new material in the lab https://www.earth.com/news/discovery-that-gold-is-reactive-metal-by-creating-gold-hydride-in-lab-experiment/ From SLAC - A SLAC team unexpectedly formed gold hydride in an experiment that could pave the way for studying materials under extreme conditions like those found inside certain planets and stars undergoing...

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
17K
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
4K