Arithmetic mean Fermi Dirac & Bose Einstein

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
4 replies · 2K views
Frank Einstein
Messages
166
Reaction score
1
Hi everybody, I was doing one asignment form class, I was tasked to prove that in one system, the arimetic mean of FD and BE distributions is equal to MB's distribution for undishtingable particles.
After doing the numbers I found out that it actually was, but I don't know why this happens, can someone explain this to me or point me to a place where I can learn that?
Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think this is a demonstration that the quantum mechanical averaged values behave classically.
Mind that the classical analogue of the Bose Einstein/Fermi Dirac distributions is the Maxwell Boltzmann distribution (give the number density as a function of the energy of the system).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Frank Einstein
For all temperatures? That would surprise me. Fermi-Dirac includes particles at an energy way above the energies Maxwell-Boltzmann at low temperatures would give, and I don't see how MB would reproduce the step coming from Fermi-Dirac at the Fermi energy.
 
Well, to be honest I have not advanced that much in theory lessons. All I know is that I have a system with two particles and three possible enrgies for them and I had to study the partiton function for each of the three distributions, I checked that the math were right and saw that it acturally worked so I asked the quastion.

By the way thank you very much for your anwsers.
 
Ah, for only two particles it might look different.
I'm not convinced that it works out for all temperatures, however. In the limit of large temperature: sure.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Frank Einstein