MHB [ASK] Determinant of a Matrix with Polynomial Elements

AI Thread Summary
To simplify the determinant of a matrix with polynomial elements, it is recommended to use row and column operations. The process begins by subtracting one row from another to simplify the elements, as demonstrated with specific calculations. Continuing this method leads to a series of transformations that ultimately simplify the matrix significantly. Following these steps will yield a final result of the constant value -8. This approach effectively reduces the complexity of the determinant calculation.
Monoxdifly
MHB
Messages
288
Reaction score
0
Help me if what I have done so far can be simplified further.
 

Attachments

  • Capture.JPG
    Capture.JPG
    59.4 KB · Views: 110
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Monoxdifly said:
Help me if what I have done so far can be simplified further.
You would do better to evaluate this determinant using row and column operations. Start by subtracting row 2 from row 3, using calculations like $(n+2)^2 - (n+1)^2 = n^2+4n+4 - (n^2+2n+1) = 2n+3$: $$ \begin{vmatrix}n^2 & (n+1)^2 & (n+2)^2 \\ (n+1)^2 & (n+2)^2 & (n+3)^2 \\ (n+2)^2 & (n+3)^2 & (n+4)^2 \end{vmatrix} = \begin{vmatrix}n^2 & (n+1)^2 & (n+2)^2 \\ (n+1)^2 & (n+2)^2 & (n+3)^2 \\ 2n+3 & 2n+5 & 2n+7 \end{vmatrix}.$$ Then continue like this: $$\begin{aligned} \begin{vmatrix}n^2 & (n+1)^2 & (n+2)^2 \\ (n+1)^2 & (n+2)^2 & (n+3)^2 \\ (n+2)^2 & (n+3)^2 & (n+4)^2 \end{vmatrix} &= \begin{vmatrix}n^2 & (n+1)^2 & (n+2)^2 \\ (n+1)^2 & (n+2)^2 & (n+3)^2 \\ 2n+3 & 2n+5 & 2n+7 \end{vmatrix} \\ \\ \text{(Subtract row 1 from row 2)}\qquad &= \begin{vmatrix}n^2 & (n+1)^2 & (n+2)^2 \\ 2n+1 & 2n+3 & 2n+5 \\ 2n+3 & 2n+5 & 2n+7 \end{vmatrix} \\ \\ \text{(Subtract col 2 from col 3)}\qquad &= \begin{vmatrix}n^2 & (n+1)^2 & 2n+3 \\ 2n+1 & 2n+3 & 2\\ 2n+3 & 2n+5 & 2 \end{vmatrix} \\ \\ \text{(Subtract col 1 from col 2)}\qquad &= \begin{vmatrix}n^2 & 2n+1 & 2n+3 \\ 2n+1 & 2& 2\\ 2n+3 & 2 & 2 \end{vmatrix} .\end{aligned}$$ Now subtract col 2 from col 3. Proceed in this way and you should end with a very simple answer, namely the constant $-8$.
 
Last edited:
Okay, thanks Opalg!
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Back
Top