Asteroid deflected by Earth -- effect on Earth

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the effects of an asteroid's encounter with Earth, specifically focusing on the proportional change in Earth's kinetic energy, the change in the semi-major axis of Earth's orbit, and the lengthening of its orbital period. The problem involves concepts from celestial mechanics and orbital dynamics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss various approaches to calculating the changes in kinetic energy and orbital parameters, with some questioning the sufficiency of the angle of deflection provided. There are requests for clarification on the reasoning behind certain formulas and calculations, as well as discussions on the conservation of momentum and relative velocities.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants sharing their calculations and seeking clarification on the underlying principles. Some have uploaded images to illustrate their setups, while others are probing for more detailed explanations of the formulas used. There is a mix of interpretations and attempts to reconcile different approaches without a clear consensus yet.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference previous problems and equations from their textbook, indicating that the discussion is grounded in specific homework constraints and prior knowledge of orbital mechanics. There are mentions of missing information and the need for clarity on certain variables and their definitions.

Dazed&Confused
Messages
190
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement


Suppose the asteroid of [other problem] has a mass of 6 \times 10^{20} \textrm{kg}. Find the proportional change in the kinetic energy of the Earth in this encounter. What is the change in the semi-major axis of the Earth's orbit? By how much is its orbital period lengthened?

Other problem:
Suppose the asteroid of [other problems] approaches the Earth with an impact parameter of 5 R_E, where R_E = Earth's radius, moving in the same plane and overtaking it. Find the distance of closest approach and the angle which the asteroid is scattered, in the frame of reference in which the Earth is at rest.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
The value of Earth's velocity is 28.9km/s and that of the comet is 38.6km/s. The angle of deflection was 18.4 degrees. I tried calculating
\dot{\textrm{R}} - \frac{m_1}{M} \dot{\textrm{r}} to work out the new velocity and from that the energy change. The book's answer was 3\times10^{-6} whereas mine was 59\times 10^{-6}. I'm not sure if my approach is correct.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The angle of deflection is not sufficient, you also have to know the initial or final direction or something else about the geometry of the problem.

Where does your formula come from?
 
Dazed&Confused said:
I tried calculating ##
\dot{\textrm{R}} - \frac{m_1}{M} \dot{\textrm{r}}## to work out the new velocity and from that the energy change.
It is not clear what your reasoning or algebra is from that decsription. Please post the details of what you did and on what basis.
 
OK I uploaded a couple of images. The first shows the set up and the second what has happened in the reference frame of the Earth.

Here \dot{\textrm{R}} is
<br /> \frac{m_1 \dot{\textrm{r}}_1 + m_2 \dot{\textrm{r}}_2}{m_1+m_2}<br />
which is the velocity of the centre of mass and \dot{\textrm{r}} = \dot{\textrm{r}}_1-\dot{\textrm{r}}_2. The formula I quoted is that of \dot{\textrm{r}}_2. Here \dot{\textrm{r}} is the velocity of the comet in Earth's reference frame. I find Earth's velocity components with this formula and then this speed to find the kinetic energy.

Edit: for some reason the text did not show up, but here Earth is traveling at 29.8km/s, the comet at 38.6km/s, and the angle is 18.4 degrees.
 

Attachments

The relative velocity between Earth and asteroid does not change, and conservation of momentum gives the final velocity of all components. Start there, then you can be sure to have the right formulas.
 
What about the equation \mu \ddot{\textrm{r}} = \textrm{F}? Wouldn't \dot{\textrm{r}} change in this case? Also the deflection angle is the one you calculate from the previous question, which is confirmed in the solutions.
 
Also the formula for \dot{\textrm{r}}_1 is \dot{\textrm{R}} + m_2/M \dot{\textrm{r}} and we find that the total momentum is m_1 \dot{\textrm{r}}_1 + m_2 \dot{\textrm{r}}_2 = M \dot{\textrm{R}} so that momentum is conserved according to them.
 
Do you know F as function of time? If not, it doesn't help.

What are r1, r2? You are wildly combining various different formulas and symbols without introducing them or showing where they come from. That does not help.
 
The previous question was from chapter 4 of the book and had a section on orbits from inverse square law forces. It had subsections on hyperbolic orbits and the deflection, from which I was able to obtain the previous result.
 
  • #10
Sorry I didn't notice your question. Here \textrm{r}_1 and \textrm{r}_2 are the positions of the comet and Earth, respectively.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
8K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
5K
Replies
33
Views
6K
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
13K
Replies
1
Views
2K