Asteroidal Bombardment in Space Warfare

  • Thread starter Thread starter schonovic
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the concept of asteroidal bombardment as a primary strategy in space warfare, emphasizing the practicality of using asteroids as weapons due to their availability and destructive potential. It argues that while advanced technology may evolve, traditional weapons like nukes and asteroids could remain effective and cost-efficient compared to high-tech options. The conversation also touches on the limitations of current weaponry, suggesting that excessive use can lead to malfunctions. Additionally, there is a divergence in views regarding the future of military technology, with some participants envisioning more advanced weaponry rather than reliance on basic projectiles. Ultimately, the thread highlights differing opinions on the nature of warfare in space and the potential for alien military strategies.
schonovic
Messages
85
Reaction score
0
I was thinking about how the "main stream" sci-fi shows have the magical starships with their fancy weapons and that's great but I think if they want to show how war will be fought in space they should know,a good general studies strategy but a great general studies logistics. The first thing that would happen in a war in space is we'd start throwing rocks around. Asteroids. That's how you get the party started. Then nukes. Then the fancy weapons would be used to get rid of those last few pockets of resistance. Fancy weapons fry with excessive use. Metal parts warp out of shape. moving parts jam. We'd use them sparingly. Rocks in space are free. And all they need is a good nudge in the right direction to do heavy damage. Then Nukes are pre-made and destructive. More expensive than rocks but cheaper than lasers or particle cannons. Especially cheaper than fancy main stream sci-fi starship weaponry. So that's my humble opinion, what do you think?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think you underestimate the likelihood of significant advances in technology. For example, "Fancy weapons fry with excessive use" is applicable to only some weapons today and likely to be applicable to fewer tomorrow.
 
Oh I have magical starships with fancy weapons but I just like to get down and dirty, it's fun. Rocks are free, nukes are cheap and they're both destructive.
 
If you can nudge an asteroid into a collision orbit with the enemy they can nudge it out. Then there's the issue of how long it would take for the asteroid to hit the target given its new orbit.

In any case this thread is not in line with the SF forum rules. Unless there are specific works of fiction you want to discuss or help with a writing project the thread will be locked.
 
I don't think explosives or asteroids would at all be in the arsenal of a super advanced military race. If you have an asteroid, you have the raw materials for military drones. If I were an alien hell-bent on taking over earth, I'd drop a billion terminators into the major cities and military bases. Remember in The Matrix (I forget which one) a swarm of thousands of drones entered the city? That's what I imagine an alien invasion would be like.
Matrix-Machines-Best-Movie-AI.jpg
 
We've just had an interesting thread about generation ships, but I don't think that that is the most reasonable way to colonize another planet. Fatal problems: - Crew may become chaotic and self destructive. - Crew may become so adapted to space as to be unwilling to return to a planet. - Making the planet habitable may take longer then the trip, so the ship needs to last far longer than just the journey. - Mid-flight malfunction may render the ship unable to decelerate at the destination...
I know this topic is extremely contraversial and debated, but I'm writing a book where an AI attempts to become as human as possible. Would it, eventually, especially in the far future, be possible for an AI to gain a conscious? To be clear, my definition of a consciousness being the ability to possess self-created morals, thoughts, and views, AKA a whole personality. And if this is possible (and let's just say it is for this question), about how long may it take for something to happen...
This is a question for people who know about astrophysics. It's been said that the habitable zones around red dwarf stars are so close to those stars that any planets in the zones would be tidally locked to the stars in question. With one side roasting and another side freezing almost forever, those planets wouldn't be hospitable to life. a) Could there be forms of life--whole ecologies--that first evolve in the planet's twilight zone and then extend their habitat by burrowing...

Similar threads

Back
Top