Undergrad Asymptotic Behavior of Modified Bessel Functions

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the integral f(x) = ∫(e^(iux)/√(u² + 1)) du and its potential closed-form solution or asymptotic behavior. Participants explore the behavior of f(x) for x > 0 and x < 0, noting the presence of poles in the upper and lower half-planes, respectively. The conversation highlights that the integral is related to modified Bessel functions of the second kind, specifically K_0(x). Additionally, it is mentioned that the imaginary part of the integral vanishes due to symmetry. Overall, the thread emphasizes the complexity of the integral and the need for further research into its properties.
stevendaryl
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
Messages
8,943
Reaction score
2,954
Does anyone know whether the following integral has a closed-form solution? If not, is anything known about the asymptotic behavior?

f(x) = \int_{-\infty}^{+\infty} \frac{e^{iux}}{\sqrt{u^2 + 1}} du
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Does it help that ##f''(x)-f(x)=\delta(x)##?

Oops missed the square root
 
I don't know the complex variable residue theory as well as I should, but for x>0, I think the contour closes in the upper half plane and has a single pole at z=+i inside the contour so that ## f(x)=2 \pi i exp(-x) ##. For x<0, the contour would close in the lower half plane with a pole at z=-i and the counterclockwise path would give a minus sign, so that ## f(x)=-2 \pi i exp(+x) ##. I'm not sure about this function with the sqrt. in the denominator is considered to have simple poles. Perhaps @micromass can answer that. editing... and I missed the term of sqrt (2i) in the denominator for the part without the pole. Will need to research this further...editing ... multiplying numerator and denominator by sqrt (u^2+1) gives the function simple poles, but I'm still at the drawing board=perhaps there is a simple solution... editing... thought I had a possible answer, but still at the drawing board...
 
Last edited:
It is modified Bessel functions of the second kind ##K_0(x)## (I assume ##z=x## in your integral), see, for example, here, equation (6). You should find a lot of information about Bessel functions (as well as about all other special functions) in Abramowitz and Stegun.
 
  • Like
Likes Paul Colby and Charles Link
Hawkeye18 said:
It is modified Bessel functions of the second kind ##K_0(x)## (I assume ##z=x## in your integral), see, for example, here, equation (6). You should find a lot of information about Bessel functions (as well as about all other special functions) in Abramowitz and Stegun.

Thanks. I should have noticed that the imaginary part of my integral vanishes by symmetry.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K