Atmospheric CO2 removal technologies?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jimster41
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Atmospheric Co2
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around potential technologies for atmospheric CO2 removal, exploring various methods and their feasibility. Participants consider both biological and chemical approaches, as well as the scale and time required for these technologies to be effective.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose various technologies, including super trees and algae towers, as potential candidates for CO2 removal.
  • One participant emphasizes that any effective technology would need to be implemented on a massive scale and would take a long time to show results.
  • Reforestation is suggested as a straightforward and effective approach to CO2 reduction, with one participant highlighting the role of the Russian taiga in oxygen replenishment.
  • Concerns are raised about the accuracy of claims regarding the oxygen content replenished by the taiga, with calls for further research.
  • Some participants discuss the potential of phytoplankton and the challenges associated with enhancing their growth through iron fertilization.
  • There is mention of the energy-intensive nature of CO2 capture and the challenges associated with compression and transportation of captured CO2.
  • Bioengineering is considered a fascinating but potentially risky approach, while reforestation and greening deserts are viewed as safer alternatives.
  • One participant expresses skepticism about the feasibility of large-scale gas separation technologies in power plants.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views on the effectiveness and feasibility of different CO2 removal technologies. There is no clear consensus, as some advocate for biological methods like reforestation, while others explore chemical processes and bioengineering, leading to ongoing debate and uncertainty.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the limitations of current understanding regarding the efficiency of various CO2 removal methods and the complexity of natural processes involved in CO2 absorption and oxygen production.

  • #61
Dr. Courtney said:
The attached graph shows the Mauna Loa data with the best fit exponential, line, and cubic polynomial.
Where is that data from?
What are the equations and coefficients for the linear, exponential and cubic fits?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #63
So what were your equations and coefficients?
 
  • #64
Baluncore said:
So what were your equations and coefficients?

You are welcome to download the data and repeat the analysis if you want these details.

This line of discussion also seems to drift further away from the OP.
 
Last edited:
  • #65
Thread locked for moderation.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
12K
Replies
17
Views
7K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K