Atomic Wavefunction Integration Question

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the point at which the area under the curve of atomic orbitals reaches 90% of the total integral from 0 to infinity. The user seeks a simpler method than a Riemann sum for this calculation, ideally looking for a straightforward factor based on quantum numbers. Suggestions include calculating the integral analytically if the wavefunction or Schrödinger equation is available. There is also a query about how to approach an infinite Riemann sum and where to determine the cutoff. The conversation emphasizes the need for a more efficient computational approach to avoid excessive processing.
Kestrel
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Hello, I'm writing a program, and while I have a decent understanding of wavefunctions and atomic orbitals, this one appears to be a problem I can't beat.

I'm graphing various properties of atomic orbitals (wavefunction, wavefunction squared, radial probability distribution, and a cross section). I'm trying to find, roughly, the point at which the area under the curve reaches 90% (In otherwords, the integral of the function from 0 to x equals 90% the integral of the function from 0 to infinity). I could, I suppose, have the computer do a Riemann sum and calculate it that way, but I was wondering if there was a simpler way. The math is above me, forgive my ignorance, I'm a senior in high school with a semester of calculus under my belt.

Ideally, there would be a simple factor for each quantum number. For example, if you increase n by 1, the you would just multiply the 90% cutoff by 2, or some such number. Increase l by 1, and you would multiply the 90% cutoff point by 1.4. But I'm sure it's more complicated than that.

Any and all help would be greatly appreciated. If all else fails, I'll do a Riemann sum, but I just don't want to tax the computer any more if there's a simpler way.

Thanks in advance!
Scott
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you have the wavefunction, you (or someone here) can calculate the integral analytically and you can simply search for that value. So, do you have the wavefunction (or at least Schrödinger equation? in it's differential form, for it might be solved)

Just for my curiosity, how are you going to make an inifinite Riemann sum?? Do you know where to cut the sum?
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
756
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K