Hello, I'm writing a program, and while I have a decent understanding of wavefunctions and atomic orbitals, this one appears to be a problem I can't beat.(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

I'm graphing various properties of atomic orbitals (wavefunction, wavefunction squared, radial probability distribution, and a cross section). I'm trying to find, roughly, the point at which the area under the curve reaches 90% (In otherwords, the integral of the function from 0 to x equals 90% the integral of the function from 0 to infinity). I could, I suppose, have the computer do a Riemann sum and calculate it that way, but I was wondering if there was a simpler way. The math is above me, forgive my ignorance, I'm a senior in high school with a semester of calculus under my belt.

Ideally, there would be a simple factor for each quantum number. For example, if you increase n by 1, the you would just multiply the 90% cutoff by 2, or some such number. Increase l by 1, and you would multiply the 90% cutoff point by 1.4. But I'm sure it's more complicated than that.

Any and all help would be greatly appreciated. If all else fails, I'll do a Riemann sum, but I just don't want to tax the computer any more if there's a simpler way.

Thanks in advance!

Scott

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Dismiss Notice

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Atomic Wavefunction Integration Question

Loading...

Similar Threads for Atomic Wavefunction Integration | Date |
---|---|

I Does measuring an atom collapse the wavefunction of its parts? | Yesterday at 11:21 AM |

Normalization of Radial wavefunction of hydrogen atom | Jul 21, 2012 |

Interpetation of wavefunction - atom | Aug 16, 2011 |

Wavefunction solution to the Schrödinger Wave Equation for a H atom | Jan 12, 2011 |

Hydrogen Atom Wavefunction Boundary conditions | Nov 25, 2008 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**