Attraction of magnets to ferromagnetic materials with distance?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the relationship between the distance and attractive force between magnets and ferromagnetic materials, specifically iron. Participants highlight that while the force between two magnets is well-documented, the attraction between a magnet and ferromagnetic materials is more complex. The mathematical expression for the force between magnetic dipole moments is provided, emphasizing the need for a dipole-based representation of magnets. Additionally, calculating the energy stored in a magnetic field when a ferromagnetic material is introduced is suggested as a method to understand this attraction.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of magnetic dipole moments
  • Familiarity with magnetic field energy calculations
  • Knowledge of ferromagnetic materials and their properties
  • Basic grasp of vector calculus and physics equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the mathematical modeling of magnetic dipole interactions
  • Study the energy calculations in magnetic fields with ferromagnetic materials
  • Explore Feynman Lectures, volume 2, chapter 10, section 10-5 for analogous problems
  • Investigate the properties of permanent magnets and their bound currents
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, engineers, and researchers interested in magnetism, particularly those studying the interactions between magnets and ferromagnetic materials.

carmatic
Messages
89
Reaction score
0
all i can find on the internet are the attractive and repulsive forces between 2 magnets... where can i find the relationship between distance and attractive force , between a magnet and i.e. a piece of iron?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Dr_Morbius said:
Magnets, how do they work?

Like this http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnet

as i have said, it only contains information on the force between 2 magnets, not between a magnet and a piece of ferromagnetic material
 
Any luck with this?
I'm looking for this answer as well.
 
The force between magnets as a mathematical expression is complicated.

What I have found is the force between magnetic diople moments.

The only source that I remember specifically is wikipedia:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetic_moment#Forces_between_two_magnetic_dipoles


which gave the force acting on \vec{m}_{2} as being

\frac{3\mu_{0}}{4\pi \left\|\vec{r} \right\| ^{5}} \left[ (\vec{m}_{1} \cdot \vec{r})\vec{m}_{2} + (\vec{m}_{2} \cdot \vec{r})\vec{m}_{1} + (\vec{m}_{1} \cdot \vec{m}_{2})\vec{r} - \frac {5 ( \vec{m}_{1} \cdot \vec{r} )( \vec{m}_{2} \cdot \vec{r} ) \vec{r} }{ \left\| r \right\| ^{2}} \right]

with \vec{m}_{1} and \vec{m}_{2} being the two magnetic dipole moments, and \vec{r} is the displacement vector from the location of m1 to m2
 
Last edited:
You may be able to obtain a dipole based representation of each magnet. The permanent magnet would have "bound current", which is which is obtainable from the magnetization.
 
It is complicated to determine the attraction between a magnet and a piece of iron (or other ferromagnetic material). What you can do, if you know exactly how the magnetic field is configured, is to calculate the energy stored in that field and then calculate how much that energy would change when you place a ferromagnetic material around it. This is totally analogous to the problem Feynman analyzed on the Feynman Lectures, volume 2, chapter 10, section 10-5, with the difference Feynman did the math for electric fields and dielectrics. But the reasoning is precisely the same.

Anyways, unless you have a very simple system (such as a uniform magnetic field and a ferromagnetic plate), the math you will need to solve your problem can be quite messy.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
981