Atwood Machine and block acceleration

In summary: I'm really lost.In summary, in this problem involving an Atwood Machine, we can solve for the acceleration of the blocks using kinematic equations. From there, we can use the tensions in the cord to find the rotational inertia of the pulley. The magnitude of the blocks' acceleration can be found using the distance equation and is equal to -0.06m/s^2. The tensions in the cord that support the more massive block and the less massive block are 4.875N and 4.5402N, respectively. The rotational inertia of the pulley can be found using the equation (T1-T2)r=I\frac{a}{r} and the magnitude and direction of the pulley's
  • #1
~christina~
Gold Member
714
0
[SOLVED] Atwood Machine

Homework Statement



A pulley which is mounted in horizontal frictionless bearings, has a radius of 5.00 cm. One block has mass M = 500 g and the other has mass m = 460 g. When released from rest, the more massive block falls 75 cm in 5.00 s (without the cord slipping on the pulley.)

(a) What is the magnitude of the blocks’ acceleration? What is the tension in the cord that supports

(b) the more massive block and

(c) the less massive block?

(d) What are the magnitude and direction of the pulley’s angular acceleration?

(e) What is its rotational inertia?

(f) Find the rotational kinetic energy after 5.00 s.

http://img264.imageshack.us/img264/6785/atwoodue6.th.jpg

Homework Equations



[tex] K_i + U_i = K_f + U_f [/tex]

[tex] v= R\omega [/tex]

[tex]a_t= r\alpha[/tex]

The Attempt at a Solution



know that:

r= 5.00cm=> 0.05m

M= 500g=> 0.5kg

m= 460g = 0.46g

h= 75cm=> 0.75m

I'm not sure exactly how to get this at all.
notation confuses me somewhat for rotation motion
I was just reading the chapter today since we just learned this the other day.

a) What is magnitude of block's acceleration?

I was thinking about using Newton's second law with the forces that are on the blocks.

[tex]\sum F_{y}= m_2g - T= m_2a_y [/tex]

[tex]\sum F_{y}= T- m_1g = m_1ay [/tex]

m_2g - m_1g = a_y(m_1 + m_2)

a_y= g [(m_2 - m_1)/ (m_1 + m_2)]

However I don't think I'm supposed to get the acceleration this way...since they give the radius and the time...I don't know how to incorperate the time and the radius if I need to.

Help please.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
As I know should be

[tex]Mg-T_1=Ma[/tex]

[tex]T_2-mg=ma[/tex]

[tex](T_1-T_2)r=I\frac{a}{r}[/tex]

[tex](Mg-Ma-mg-ma)r=I\frac{a}{r}[/tex]
 
  • #3
azatkgz said:
As I know should be

[tex]Mg-T_1=Ma[/tex]

[tex]T_2-mg=ma[/tex]

[tex](T_1-T_2)r=I\frac{a}{r}[/tex]

[tex](Mg-Ma-mg-ma)r=I\frac{a}{r}[/tex]

so tension isn't the same for both then..

but why is it [tex](T_1-T_2)r=I\frac{a}{r}[/tex]

Is the [tex]T_2 [/tex] negative since that direction is clockwise?
 
  • #4
[tex]T_1[/tex] is trying to rotate pulley in clockwise direction.

[tex]T_2[/tex] is trying to rotate pulley in counterclockwise directon.If there were no M,it would rotate in counterclockwise direction.Here difference of them contributes to the rotation of pulley.

So torque by M is clockwise [tex]T_1r[/tex] and torque by [tex]T_2[/tex] is counterclockwise [tex]T_2r[/tex]
 
  • #5
azatkgz said:
As I know should be

[tex]Mg-T_1=Ma[/tex]

[tex]T_2-mg=ma[/tex]

[tex](T_1-T_2)r=I\frac{a}{r}[/tex]

[tex](Mg-Ma-mg-ma)r=I\frac{a}{r}[/tex]


I was wondering how would I find the acceleration?

I expanded the last equation but ran into some trouble.

[tex](Mg-Ma-mg-ma)r=I\frac{a}{r}[/tex]

I don't have (a) but I did this...

since I= mr^2
and a= r[tex]\alpha[/tex]

[tex]r(Mg- Ma - mg - ma) = (mr^2)(a/r)[/tex]

r(Mg-Ma - mg -ma) = m*r*a

however I'm not quite sure what m are they referring to when I replace the m in the I for moment of inertia.

Is I= (M+m)(r^2) ?


Help..I'm still not sure how to find the acceleration b/c I found that the accelerations would just cancel out if I'm not wrong..so how would I isolate the accleration?

And I'm not sure what I = ? since generally I= mr^2 but here there are 2 masses...so is mass = M+ m?

Help please:frown:
 
  • #6
When you look at pullley,you'll have two tensions and pulley.We need to take just moment of inertia of pulley.
 
  • #7
I don't get what your saying...I was speaking of the Inertia of the pulley but what if I don't have the mass of the pulley?

can anybody help me out?
 
  • #8
You don't need the mass of the pulley. You'll deduce its rotational inertia, not calculate it directly.

Start by finding the acceleration of each mass using kinematics. Then use that to find the tensions. Then use the tensions to figure out the rotational inertia of the pulley.
 
  • #9
Doc Al said:
You don't need the mass of the pulley. You'll deduce its rotational inertia, not calculate it directly.

Start by finding the acceleration of each mass using kinematics. Then use that to find the tensions. Then use the tensions to figure out the rotational inertia of the pulley.

a) Magnitude of block's acceleration


when you say kinematics do you mean rotational or translational equations?

I tried to use the
distance equation..

[tex]y-y_o= v_{iy}(t) + .5a_y(t)^2 [/tex]

-.075m = 0(5.00s) + .5(a_y)(5.00s)^2

[tex] a_y= -.75m/12.5s^2 [/tex]

[tex] a_y= 0.06m/s [/tex] ===> this looks odd to me...but is it right?

I was thinking that the accelerations for both blocks has to be the same since they are both connected by one cord, However you said to...

Start by finding the acceleration of each mass using kinematics.

this has confused me somewhat.


so If they ask for the "magnitude of the blocks acceleration"

I assume that this would be what they want right?


____________________________________________________

Tension in cord that supports

b) more massive block

c) less massive block


Assuming the acceleration I calculated before was correct.

[tex]a_y= 0.06m/s^2[/tex]

[tex]\sum F_{y}= Mg - T_1= Ma [/tex]

T1= Mg- Ma

[tex] T_1= .5kg(9.81m/s^2)- .5kg ( 0.06m/s^2)[/tex]

[tex] T_1 = 4.875N [/tex]

[tex]\sum F_{y}= T_2 - mg= ma [/tex]

[tex]T_2 = ma + mg [/tex]

[tex] T_2 = (0.460kg)(0.06m/s^2) + (0.460kg)(9.81m/s) [/tex]

[tex] T_2 = 4.5402 N [/tex]


[tex]\sum F_y = T_2 - mg = ma [/tex]

Start by finding the acceleration of each mass using kinematics. Then use that to find the tensions. Then use the tensions to figure out the rotational inertia of the pulley.

Um..for the rotational inertia

(T1-T2) r = [tex]I \alpha[/tex]

[tex]\alpha = a/ r[/tex] ==> you said to use these to find the rotational inertia but what is the a in the [tex]\alpha eqzn[/tex] equal to? Is this tangial acceleration the same as the acceleration I found for the blocks?

And why would I need the rotational inertia if they didn't ask for it?


d) Magnitude and direction of angular accleration

Not sure but do I use this equation

[tex](T_1-T_2)r=I\frac{a}{r}[/tex]

or since [tex]\alpha = a/ r[/tex] can I plug in acceleration as the one I found before for

the blocks ([tex] a= \alpha/r [/tex]) since I have the radius?



THANKS ALOT
 
Last edited:
  • #10
~christina~ said:
a) Magnitude of block's acceleration


when you say kinematics do you mean rotational or translational equations?

I tried to use the
distance equation..

[tex]y-y_o= v_{iy}(t) + .5a_y(t)^2 [/tex]

-.075m = 0(5.00s) + .5(a_y)(5.00s)^2

[tex] a_y= -.75m/12.5s^2 [/tex]

[tex] a_y= 0.06m/s [/tex] ===> this looks odd to me...but is it right?
Looks good to me.
I was thinking that the accelerations for both blocks has to be the same since they are both connected by one cord, However you said to...



this has confused me somewhat.


so If they ask for the "magnitude of the blocks acceleration"

I assume that this would be what they want right?
Yes, the blocks have the same magnitude of acceleration. (So you only have to calculate it once.)
____________________________________________________

Tension in cord that supports

b) more massive block

c) less massive block


Assuming the acceleration I calculated before was correct.

[tex]a_y= 0.06m/s^2[/tex]

[tex]\sum F_{y}= Mg - T_1= Ma [/tex]

T1= Mg- Ma

[tex] T_1= .5kg(9.81m/s^2)- .5kg ( 0.06m/s^2)[/tex]

[tex] T_1 = 4.875N [/tex]

[tex]\sum F_{y}= T_2 - mg= ma [/tex]

[tex]T_2 = ma + mg [/tex]

[tex] T_2 = (0.460kg)(0.06m/s^2) + (0.460kg)(9.81m/s) [/tex]

[tex] T_2 = 4.5402 N [/tex]
Perfect.
Um..for the rotational inertia

(T1-T2) r = [tex]I \alpha[/tex]

[tex]\alpha = a/ r[/tex] ==> you said to use these to find the rotational inertia but what is the a in the [tex]\alpha eqzn[/tex] equal to? Is this tangial acceleration the same as the acceleration I found for the blocks?
Yes, [itex]a = \alpha r[/itex] with the same acceleration (a) as the blocks (and rope) have.
And why would I need the rotational inertia if they didn't ask for it?
They ask for it in part e.
d) Magnitude and direction of angular accleration

Not sure but do I use this equation

[tex](T_1-T_2)r=I\frac{a}{r}[/tex]
You'll use this for the next part (e).
or since [tex]\alpha = a/ r[/tex] can I plug in acceleration as the one I found before for

the blocks ([tex] a= \alpha/r [/tex]) since I have the radius?
That's the one you want. (But that last equation should be: [itex]\alpha = a/r[/itex].)
 
  • #11
Doc Al said:
Looks good to me.

Yes, the blocks have the same magnitude of acceleration. (So you only have to calculate it once.)

just like I thought

They ask for it in part e.

oh what do you know..they do ask for it..


d) What is magnitude and direction of pulley's angular acceleration

[tex]\alpha = a/ r[/tex]

using the acceleration of the blocks as the a

[tex]\alpha = 0.06m/s^2 / .05m = 1.2s^-2 [/tex]

direction=> is in the page? since I'm thinking right hand rule and the pulley turns clockwise.

e) rotational inertia?

have the [tex] \alpha = 1.2 s^-2[/tex]

[tex](T_1-T_2)r=I \alpha[/tex]

[tex] T_1 = 4.875N [/tex]

[tex] T_2 = 4.5402N [/tex]

[tex]\frac{4.875N- 4.5402N} {1.2s^-2} = 0.279N/s^-2 [/tex]
Not sure about the units...

f) rotational kinetic E after 5.00s

[tex] K_r = \frac {1} {2} I \omega^2 [/tex]

[tex] K_r = \frac {1} {2} I \theta/t [/tex]

basically I'm not sure how to get this.


Thanks
 
  • #12
~christina~ said:
d) What is magnitude and direction of pulley's angular acceleration

[tex]\alpha = a/ r[/tex]

using the acceleration of the blocks as the a

[tex]\alpha = 0.06m/s^2 / .05m = 1.2s^-2 [/tex]
Good.

direction=> is in the page? since I'm thinking right hand rule and the pulley turns clockwise.
All they want to know is whether its clockwise or counterclockwise. (I wouldn't worry about vectors here.)

e) rotational inertia?

have the [tex] \alpha = 1.2 s^-2[/tex]

[tex](T_1-T_2)r=I \alpha[/tex]

[tex] T_1 = 4.875N [/tex]

[tex] T_2 = 4.5402N [/tex]

[tex]\frac{4.875N- 4.5402N} {1.2s^-2} = 0.279N/s^-2 [/tex]
Not sure about the units...
Redo this. In calculating the torque, you left off the radius.

Since the basic formula for I is mr^2, the simplest units for I would be kg-m^2.

f) rotational kinetic E after 5.00s

[tex] K_r = \frac {1} {2} I \omega^2 [/tex]
Good.

[tex] K_r = \frac {1} {2} I \theta/t [/tex]
Not good. Use kinematics to find the angular velocity of the pulley after 5.00 s. You already found the angular acceleration, so use it.
 
  • #13
Thank You Doc Al for all your help :smile:
 
  • #14
~christina~ said:
a) Magnitude of block's acceleration

[...]

[tex] a_y= 0.06m/s [/tex] ===> this looks odd to me...but is it right?

I'm a little confused here (of course I can't get past the simple stuff) but I keep getting 0.03m/s^2 instead of 0.06. What did I do wrong here:

Assuming the acceleration is constant

a=v/t

v=d/t

So put d/t in the a equation, and i end up with

a=d/t^2
=75cm/5^2 s^2
=3cm/s^2
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #15
laurelelizabeth said:
I'm a little confused here (of course I can't get past the simple stuff) but I keep getting 0.03m/s^2 instead of 0.06. What did I do wrong here:

Assuming the acceleration is constant

a=v/t
In this equation, v stands for the final velocity (since it starts from rest).

v=d/t
This equation gives you the average velocity, not the final velocity. For constant acceleration starting from rest, the average velocity equals the final velocity divided by 2. That's why your answer is off by a factor of 2.

The proper equation to use would be:
d = 1/2 a t^2, or:
a = 2d/t^2
 
  • #16
Why is acceleration towards the pulley considered positive? Wouldn't that make gravity negative?
 

1. What is an Atwood Machine?

An Atwood Machine is a simple mechanical device that consists of two masses connected by a string or rope, with one mass hanging over a pulley. It is used to study the relationship between forces, acceleration, and mass.

2. How does an Atwood Machine work?

The Atwood Machine works by transferring the force of gravity from one mass to the other through the pulley. As one mass moves downwards, the other mass moves upwards, causing a change in acceleration.

3. What is the equation for calculating the acceleration of an Atwood Machine?

The equation for calculating the acceleration of an Atwood Machine is a = (m1 - m2)g / (m1 + m2), where m1 and m2 are the masses on either side of the pulley, and g is the acceleration due to gravity.

4. How does the acceleration of the block change when the masses are equal?

When the masses on either side of the pulley are equal, the acceleration of the block will be zero. This is because the forces on either side of the pulley are balanced, resulting in no net force on the block.

5. How does friction affect the acceleration of an Atwood Machine?

Friction can affect the acceleration of an Atwood Machine by reducing the net force acting on the block. This can result in a lower acceleration than predicted by the equation, as some of the force is used to overcome friction.

Similar threads

  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
30
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
17
Views
8K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
978
Back
Top