Atwood's Machine. I am asked to solve for the unknown mass.

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ocata
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Machine Mass
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on solving for the unknown mass (m2) in an Atwood's Machine, given a known mass (m1) and the acceleration of m1. The equation used is a_{net1} = (m1 - m2)/(m1 + m2) * g, which leads to the derived formula x = (a/g * m1 - m1) / (-a/g - 1) for calculating m2. The solution is confirmed to be correct, provided the acceleration of m1 is known. Participants emphasize the importance of including the full question in future posts for clarity.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's Second Law of Motion
  • Familiarity with Atwood's Machine concepts
  • Basic algebra for manipulating equations
  • Knowledge of gravitational acceleration (g)
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of Atwood's Machine dynamics
  • Learn how to derive equations of motion for pulleys
  • Explore experimental methods for measuring acceleration in lab settings
  • Review problem-solving techniques for physics lab assignments
USEFUL FOR

Students in physics courses, educators teaching mechanics, and anyone involved in laboratory experiments related to motion and forces.

Ocata
Messages
198
Reaction score
5

Homework Statement

Given m_1 on an Atwood's Machine, what is the mass of m_2?

Homework Equations



a_{net1} = \frac{m_{1}-m_{2}}{m_{1}+m_{2}}g

The Attempt at a Solution

a_{net1} = \frac{m_{1}-x}{m_{1}+x}g

\frac{a}{g} = \frac { m_{1} - x } { m_{1}+x }

\frac {a}{g}m_{1} + \frac{a}{g}x - m_{1} = -x

x = \frac { \frac{a}{g}(m_{1}) - m_{1} } {- \frac{a}{g} - 1}Is this correct?
 
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: oafsjgnafklgnldg
Physics news on Phys.org
Assuming that you know the acceleration of m1, yes. Please write down the full question in future posts.
 
Hi Orodruin,

This was a lab assignment, the full question was something like: Determine the mass of a block that is attached to one side of a pulley, using lab measurements. I'm assuming that I would have measured the acceleration and based on m1 and the acceleration, solve for m2.

Thank you for advising.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
659
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
6K
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 97 ·
4
Replies
97
Views
14K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
Replies
15
Views
2K