Average acceleration and total acceleration of gravity

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on calculating the time it takes for a smaller spherical object to fall to the surface of a larger spherical object under gravitational acceleration, considering the varying acceleration due to the distance between the two objects. The conversation includes differential equations, average forces, and kinematic equations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant describes the gravitational acceleration between two spherical objects and proposes calculating the time for the smaller object to hit the larger sphere's surface using average force and kinematic equations.
  • Another participant suggests writing out the equations of motion and identifies the gravitational force acting on the smaller mass as a function of distance.
  • A later reply indicates that a closed-form solution for the function of distance over time may not be possible, but an expression for time as a function of distance can be derived.
  • One participant mentions that solving the differential equation involves complex techniques and hints at an alternative method using Kepler's laws.
  • Another participant clarifies that averaging the force over distance does not yield the average acceleration, emphasizing the need for averaging over time instead.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the approach to the problem but express differing views on the methods for calculating time and the implications of averaging forces versus accelerations. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the best approach to take.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the complexity of the differential equation and the potential challenges in finding a closed-form solution. There is also a distinction made between averaging over distance and time, which may affect the calculations.

Nick Heller
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Say you have a gravitational acceleration between a spherical object of mass M and inner radius R and a much smaller spherical object of mass m (essentially point-like) and distance ro away (M >> m) with an acceleration on mass m at any point r given by
a = GM/r2
Knowing that the acceleration with respect to the distance between the two objects is not constant, how would you calculate the amount of time it would take for the object to hit the surface of the larger sphere (also assuming the larger sphere moves negligibly)? The smaller object moves from a distance ro away from the center of mass of the larger object (r = 0) to a distance R away from this center.
Solving this as a differential equation has gotten hairy. My other approach was to take the average force with respect to the distance from the center given by (the definite integral from ro to R of Fdr)/(R - ro) where F is the standard gravitational force. This comes from the equation for the average of any function. Once this average force is calculated, the acceleration is constant, so can it be inserted into the regular kinematic constant-acceleration equations to find the amount of time it would take to transverse the distance?
I am not a physicist (yet), so be merciful. Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello Nick, welcome to PF :smile: !

Not sure what you mean with "I am not a physicist (yet)" -- but if you are going to be one, you should walk the walk and talk the talk. I.e. write out equations and then solve them. In your case something like $$\vec F = m\vec a$$ and if I understand you well, $$| \vec F | = {GM m\over r^2} $$ and you describe the free fall of an object with mass m that is let go from a distance ##r_0## above M and you want to describe ##|r|## as a function of time. So you get an equation like $${d^2r\over dt^2} = -{A\over r^2}$$with ##r(t=0) = r_0##. Am I right so far ?

--
 
Yes, right so far
 
Nick Heller said:
how would you calculate the amount of time it would take for the object to hit the surface of the larger sphere (also assuming the larger sphere moves negligibly)?
You cannot find a closed form solution for a function ##r(t)##, but you can find ##t(r)##.
First, observe that ## a= v \frac{dv}{dx}##
Now assume that ##dx=-dr## (i.e. only the displacement of the smaller mass leads to a reduction in the radial distance between the two masses), so that ## \int v dv = \frac{v^2}{2} = \int_{r_0}^r - \frac{GM}{r^2} dr## where ##r_0## is the radial distance of the smaller mass from the larger mass at t=0.
You can then calculate t by substituting ##v=\frac{dx}{dt} = \frac{-dr}{dt}##, and rearranging the differentials so that $$ t = \int_{r_0}^{r} \frac{-dr}{\sqrt{2 \int_{r_0}^r - \frac{GM}{r^2} dr}}$$
You can then just substitute ##r=R## into the final expression you get to calculate the time the smaller mass takes to fall that radial distance. (Remember to compute the definite integral in the denominator first.)
 
Nick Heller said:
Yes, right so far
Solving the differential equation involves a couple of tricks that are not easy to spot.

You can also get the answer from Kepler's laws. But, again, the trick is not easy to spot.
 
By the way, the average of the force over distance will not give you the average acceleration.
You need the average over time.

You can use the average over distance to calculate the work, though. Which is the same as doing that integral.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 138 ·
5
Replies
138
Views
9K