Axis of rotation, plane of reflection

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the relationship between the axis of rotation and the plane of reflection in a 3x3 orthogonal matrix with a determinant of -1. It is established that when a vector rotates around the x-axis, the reflection occurs about the same axis, confirming that the axis of rotation coincides with the plane of reflection. The mathematical framework involves the use of special unitary groups, specifically SU(3) and SU(2), to demonstrate the transformations involved. The challenge presented is to prove that the constructed matrix W, which combines rotation and reflection, is proportional to a real matrix.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of orthogonal matrices and their properties
  • Familiarity with determinants and their implications in linear transformations
  • Knowledge of special unitary groups, specifically SU(3) and SU(2)
  • Basic concepts of vector rotation and reflection in three-dimensional space
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of orthogonal matrices in linear algebra
  • Learn about the implications of determinants in transformations
  • Explore the structure and applications of special unitary groups (SU(3) and SU(2))
  • Investigate the relationship between rotation matrices and reflection matrices in 3D space
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and computer scientists interested in linear algebra, particularly those working with transformations in three-dimensional space and applications in quantum mechanics.

JamesGoh
Messages
140
Reaction score
0
For a 3x3 orthogonal matrix with determinant= -1 (which means rotation followed by simple reflection), is the axis of rotation the same as the plane of reflection ?

My reasoning is follows (see attachment)

Say you have two vectors with the same angle size (which i call A), same x-values, but one of the z-values (height in this case), is the negative of the other (n.b. y-value is zero in both vectors )

Vector 1 rotates around the x-axis by 2A to get to the same spot as vector 2. Because the angle size is the same and because the z-component of vector 2 is the negative of the z-component of vector 1, we get a reflection ?

Since the "reflection" happens about the x-axis, this is why the plane of reflection is the same as the axis of rotation in the case of a 3x3 orthogonal matrix having determinant 1 ?
 

Attachments

  • examplepicture.jpg
    examplepicture.jpg
    4.1 KB · Views: 565
Physics news on Phys.org
if [itex]A\in \textrm{O}(3,\mathbb{R})[/itex] and [itex]\det(A)=-1[/itex], there exists a [itex]U\in \textrm{SU}(3)[/itex] such that

[tex] UAU^{\dagger} = \left(\begin{array}{ccc}<br /> -1 & 0 & 0 \\<br /> 0 & e^{i\theta} & 0 \\<br /> 0 & 0 & e^{-i\theta} \\<br /> \end{array}\right)[/tex]

with some [itex]\theta\in\mathbb{R}[/itex].

Then there exists a [itex]V\in \textrm{SU}(2)[/itex] such that

[tex] V\left(\begin{array}{cc}<br /> e^{i\theta} & 0 \\<br /> 0 & e^{-i\theta} \\<br /> \end{array}\right)V^{\dagger}<br /> = \left(\begin{array}{cc}<br /> \cos(\theta) & -\sin(\theta) \\<br /> \sin(\theta) & \cos(\theta) \\<br /> \end{array}\right)[/tex]

So if you define

[tex] W = \left(\begin{array}{cc}<br /> 1 & 0 \\<br /> 0 & V \\<br /> \end{array}\right)U[/tex]

then [itex]WAW^{\dagger}[/itex] will be of such form that reflection and rotation are clearly carried out with respect to the same axis. Only problem is that [itex]W[/itex] doesn't necessarily have only real entries. How to prove that [itex]W[/itex] is necessarily proportional to a real matrix?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
31
Views
3K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K