B-field from a current in a wire above a conducting surface

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on understanding the magnetic field generated by an infinite current wire positioned above a neutral, conducting surface. The initial thought was to apply imaging techniques, typically used in electrostatics, to analyze the magnetic field behavior. It is noted that adding a current in the opposite direction does not lead to cancellation of fields at the surface. The key equation for the magnetic field around a wire is provided, emphasizing the circumferential nature of the field. The conclusion suggests that imaging techniques can be effectively utilized for this scenario.
Sidsid
Messages
16
Reaction score
2
Homework Statement
What is qualitatively the difference between the magnetic field of an infinite current wire and one with the addition of an infinite , neutral, conducting surface under it. Find it for points between them,under the surface, and above the wire. The magnetic field is 0 at the conductor.
Relevant Equations
B= (mu_0* I)/(2pi r) (circumferential)
I first thought of imaging techniques, because the setup reminded me of it, but i have only ever seen those of electrostatics. If i for example add a current in the opposite direction and with the opposite heigth of the surface the fields dont cancel out at the surface, i think. What is the best approach?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Sidsid said:
Homework Statement: What is qualitatively the difference between the magnetic field of an infinite current wire and one with the addition of an infinite , neutral, conducting surface under it. Find it for points between them,under the surface, and above the wire. The magnetic field is 0 at the conductor.
Relevant Equations: B= (mu_0* I)/(2pi r) (circumferential)

I first thought of imaging techniques, because the setup reminded me of it, but i have only ever seen those of electrostatics. If i for example add a current in the opposite direction and with the opposite height of the surface the fields don't cancel out at the surface, i think. What is the best approach?
Yes. Use imaging techniques.
 
Thread 'Chain falling out of a horizontal tube onto a table'
My attempt: Initial total M.E = PE of hanging part + PE of part of chain in the tube. I've considered the table as to be at zero of PE. PE of hanging part = ##\frac{1}{2} \frac{m}{l}gh^{2}##. PE of part in the tube = ##\frac{m}{l}(l - h)gh##. Final ME = ##\frac{1}{2}\frac{m}{l}gh^{2}## + ##\frac{1}{2}\frac{m}{l}hv^{2}##. Since Initial ME = Final ME. Therefore, ##\frac{1}{2}\frac{m}{l}hv^{2}## = ##\frac{m}{l}(l-h)gh##. Solving this gives: ## v = \sqrt{2g(l-h)}##. But the answer in the book...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
10K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
897
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K