B-field from a current in a wire above a conducting surface

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on understanding the magnetic field generated by an infinite current wire positioned above a neutral, conducting surface. The initial thought was to apply imaging techniques, typically used in electrostatics, to analyze the magnetic field behavior. It is noted that adding a current in the opposite direction does not lead to cancellation of fields at the surface. The key equation for the magnetic field around a wire is provided, emphasizing the circumferential nature of the field. The conclusion suggests that imaging techniques can be effectively utilized for this scenario.
Sidsid
Messages
16
Reaction score
2
Homework Statement
What is qualitatively the difference between the magnetic field of an infinite current wire and one with the addition of an infinite , neutral, conducting surface under it. Find it for points between them,under the surface, and above the wire. The magnetic field is 0 at the conductor.
Relevant Equations
B= (mu_0* I)/(2pi r) (circumferential)
I first thought of imaging techniques, because the setup reminded me of it, but i have only ever seen those of electrostatics. If i for example add a current in the opposite direction and with the opposite heigth of the surface the fields dont cancel out at the surface, i think. What is the best approach?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Sidsid said:
Homework Statement: What is qualitatively the difference between the magnetic field of an infinite current wire and one with the addition of an infinite , neutral, conducting surface under it. Find it for points between them,under the surface, and above the wire. The magnetic field is 0 at the conductor.
Relevant Equations: B= (mu_0* I)/(2pi r) (circumferential)

I first thought of imaging techniques, because the setup reminded me of it, but i have only ever seen those of electrostatics. If i for example add a current in the opposite direction and with the opposite height of the surface the fields don't cancel out at the surface, i think. What is the best approach?
Yes. Use imaging techniques.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Back
Top