Back and Forth Massive Motion makes fly more stable

  • Thread starter Thread starter jamesadrian
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Motion Stable
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the mechanism that may enhance the stability of a house fly's flight, specifically through the movement of masses along a line. The theory suggests that changing the direction of these masses requires work, and there is curiosity about whether this motion could help a fly stop rotating. It is noted that flies possess halters instead of a second pair of wings, which provide gyroscopic stability and act as turn-rate sensors. The conversation also references a robotic fly that mimics these principles. Overall, the exploration of fly anatomy and its implications for flight stability is emphasized.
jamesadrian
Messages
32
Reaction score
2
i was once told that a mechanism on the back of a house fly makes its flight more stable than it might otherwise be by driving a mass or a pair of masses back and forth along a line.

My theory is that changing the direction of the line along which these masses are traveling requires work.

I also wonder if a fly can stop rotating by starting up this back and forth motion. The two masses might alternate between moving toward each other and moving away from each other.

Whether I have the anatomy of a house fly right or not, I ask you to consider such mechanisms and whether they would work as I expect.

Thank you for your help.

Jim Adrian
 
Physics news on Phys.org
My theory is that changing the direction of the line along which these masses are traveling requires work.
Is this a personal theory or have you made some inquiries, say, of the literature to find out what is actually happening?

Most flying insects have two pairs of wings - flys have one.
Where you'd normally find the second pair, the fly has a pair of stubs called "halters".
They don't work the way you seem to be expecting, but it's hard to tell. iirc they provide a kind of gyroscopic stability but also act as sensitive turn-rate sensors.

http://animals.howstuffworks.com/insects/housefly2.htm
http://jesseenterprises.net/amsci/1960/04/1960-04-fs.html

There's a robot fly that uses the same principles.
http://www.technologyreview.com/news/408265/robotic-insect-takes-off/
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top