Background: computational condensed matter physics

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on pursuing a PhD in computational physics, particularly in the context of participants' experiences and suggestions regarding potential research areas and methodologies. It encompasses theoretical and applied aspects of computational physics, with references to various fields such as condensed matter physics, astrophysics, and fluid dynamics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Technical explanation, Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses interest in pursuing a PhD in computational physics and seeks guidance on potential research topics, leveraging their experience with VASP and FORTRAN.
  • Another participant suggests broadening the scope beyond computational physics, highlighting that researchers in fields like astrophysics and fluid dynamics also utilize FORTRAN, and that similar computational problems exist across disciplines.
  • A different viewpoint emphasizes the importance of understanding legacy code in FORTRAN, arguing that knowledge of older programming languages is valuable for effectively utilizing existing models and software.
  • One participant recommends focusing on the underlying physical concepts (the "what") rather than just the computational methods (the "how"), suggesting that areas like Density Functional Theory (DFT) could be relevant for condensed matter studies.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the value of broadening the scope of research beyond just computational physics, but there is no consensus on specific research topics or the best approach to take for a PhD.

Contextual Notes

Participants express varying opinions on the relevance of programming languages and the importance of interdisciplinary approaches, indicating that assumptions about the necessity of computational focus may differ. There are also unresolved questions about the applicability of computational methods across different fields.

Who May Find This Useful

Individuals interested in pursuing a PhD in computational physics or related fields, particularly those with a background in programming and computational methods.

teame Yitbarek
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I have my MSc in 'Computational condensed matter physics'. I used VASP package for simulation during my MSc. and i am also well experienced in FORTRAN programming language. Can anyone give me short note about 'PhD in computational physics'? so that can continue my PhD in 'Computational Physics'.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Summary:: Interested in doing 'PhD in Computational Physics' .

I want to discuss about computational physics for PhD. i have an experience in FORTRAN, vasp. what example titles or areas of study are there in computational physics (PhD)?
 
Do not restrict yourself to computational physics. Many researchers in astrophysics that I know did much of their work running models written in FORTRAN. I think the same could be said for fluid dynamics, theoretical nuclear physics, geodesy, chaos, perhaps numerical relativity, and mathematics. You may be able to approach a research advisor or an employer more broadly. For example, if your MS was solving a transport problem in solid state physics, you may find a nuclear physics position interesting, in that a similar transport problem. Nucleons move, and stars move too. The downside is you will have to develop expertise in another area.

In short, I think you may have a hard time finding a position in doing computational physics alone, if you mean solely developing algorithms to calculate physical quantities easily. You may need to find a allied field to apply the computational physics to.

Many so called "modern" programmers are pushing python right now.

However, a lot of earlier (legacy) code is in FORTRAN. I find organizations need (unfortunately they do not always value as much as I think they should) scientists that can program and know FORTRAN enough to understand what the old code did? Why the software was important, and how it can be used effectively in the future? Without knowing these answers, rewriting the code in a "modern" language is pointless.
 
I second that you should under no circumstances limit yourself to Computation. I myself have done my masters on nested sampling (Python and very little fortran). For Condensed matter, I would suggest you look into DFT (there's a lot of mathematics that lends well to Computation), and some abstract topics. I would suggest you put the what before the how and computation is pretty much the how.
 

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
4K