Background radiation and photons

In summary, the cosmic background radiation has a energy density of around 4.0207599 × 10-14 m-1 kg s-2 K-4.
  • #1
Theraven1982
25
0

Homework Statement


I have a fairly simple question, but for some reason I can't find the answer. It's about Planck's law, and cosmic background radiation.

We know Planck's law, and we know the temperature of the universe (approx 2.7 K). Furthermore, we know the mean number of photons in a field mode at T.

How much photons per litre does the background radiation contain?

Homework Equations


Planck's law: http://upload.wikimedia.org/math/8/8/5/88585bfa92a0a16aff8f1659935218c3.png"
number of photons excited in a mode at T: 1/(e^{hw/kT}-1)

I've just started following a physics course, after a few years of inactivity...

Any kicks in the right direction are welcome ;).
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Space news on Phys.org
  • #2
Theraven1982 said:

Homework Statement


I have a fairly simple question, but for some reason I can't find the answer. It's about Planck's law, and cosmic background radiation.

We know Planck's law, and we know the temperature of the universe (approx 2.7 K). Furthermore, we know the mean number of photons in a field mode at T.

How much photons per litre does the background radiation contain?

Homework Equations


Planck's law: http://upload.wikimedia.org/math/8/8/5/88585bfa92a0a16aff8f1659935218c3.png"
number of photons excited in a mode at T: 1/(e^{hw/kT}-1)

I've just started following a physics course, after a few years of inactivity...

Any kicks in the right direction are welcome ;).

this should give the energy per unit volume[tex] \frac{\pi}{15} \frac{k^4 T^4}{\hbar^3 c^3}[/tex]

when I put this
(pi/15)*(k*2.75 kelvin)^4/(hbar*c)^3
in the google search box and press search,
what google gives back is:

((pi / 15) * ((k * (2.75 kelvin))^4)) / ((hbar * c)^3) = 1.37731725 × E-14 joules per cubic meter

that must be the energy density of the CMB
then you have only to divide by the average photon energy at that temperature

(I don't mean the Wien peak, I mean the average)

the average photon in Planck-law light at temperature T is 2.701 kT

Let's see what it would be for the CMB.

I get this from the google calculator, which always puts in extra decimal places where you don't want :-)

2.70100 * Boltzmann constant * (2.75 kelvin) = 1.02551253 × E-22 joules

So if the energy density of the CMB is 1.38 E-14 joules per cubic meter
and the average energy of a photon is 1.03 E-22 joules, and you divide you get around
130 million CMB photons per cubic meter. Is that right?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #3
marcus said:
this should give the energy per unit volume


[tex] \frac{\pi}{15} \frac{k^4 T^4}{\hbar^3 c^3}[/tex]

when I put this
(pi/15)*(k*2.75 kelvin)^4/(hbar*c)^3
in the google search box and press search,
what google gives back is:

((pi / 15) * ((k * (2.75 kelvin))^4)) / ((hbar * c)^3) = 1.37731725 × E-14 joules per cubic meter

that must be the energy density of the CMB
then you have only to divide by the average photon energy at that temperature

(I don't mean the Wien peak, I mean the average)

the average photon in Planck-law light at temperature T is 2.701 kT

Let's see what it would be for the CMB.

I get this from the google calculator, which always puts in extra decimal places where you don't want :-)

2.70100 * Boltzmann constant * (2.75 kelvin) = 1.02551253 × E-22 joules

So if the energy density of the CMB is 1.38 E-14 joules per cubic meter
and the average energy of a photon is 1.03 E-22 joules, and you divide you get around
130 million CMB photons per cubic meter. Is that right?

You're a lot closer than me; the answer should be 5*10^5 photons per litre ... I'll look again at your calculation, maybe I can find the reason why there's a difference.

But a big thanks!

edit:
energy density is (according to my book): pi^2 *k^2*T^4/15c^3*hbar^3
There's an extra pi ;).

edit2:
energy density:
pi^2*k^4*2.7^4/(15*c^3*hbar^3) = 4.0207599 × 10-14 m-1 kg s-2 K-4

There must be a problem at the photon energy; if I divide by kT, i get 1.08*10^6 photons per litre. Only a factor 2 difference.
 
Last edited:
  • #4
I get about 400 million cmb photons/m^3/sec [just a pi off from marcus!]
 
  • #5
Hmm ... that's the same answer I get now... I don't know why the book says 5x10^5 photons per litre :\. I tried everything; maybe I should go with this answer instead.

Thanks for all the help! Much appreciated! (You all do a great job, helping untangle the web of science ;) )
 
  • #6
Theraven1982 said:
...
edit:
energy density is (according to my book): pi^2 *k^2*T^4/15c^3*hbar^3
There's an extra pi ;).
...

right! I was going by memory and forgot a factor of pi. thanks for catching that!
 
  • #7
I finally found the right solution (well, my teacher did.. when I got to the Riemann zeta function, I always thought: This can't be correct... but it was). But it appears the above mentioned answer was correct as well; or at least it gets very close to the result my teacher gave me. Maybe the book was wrong.
But at least there's a second way to find the answer:
You have to integrate <n> (number of photons excited in a mode) * rho (density of modes).
See http://nullify.wordpress.com/2007/09/01/cosmic-background-radiation/
(There's a pdf with a solution there; this is for reference only ... for future generations ;) .. )
 
Last edited:

1. What is background radiation?

Background radiation refers to the low levels of radiation that exist in our environment at all times. This radiation comes from natural sources such as the sun, rocks, soil, and even our own bodies.

2. How is background radiation measured?

Background radiation is typically measured using a unit called the rem (roentgen equivalent man). This unit takes into account the type and energy of the radiation and its potential impact on human health.

3. What are photons?

Photons are tiny particles of energy that make up electromagnetic radiation, including background radiation. These particles have no mass and travel at the speed of light.

4. How does background radiation affect living organisms?

Background radiation can have both positive and negative effects on living organisms. Low levels of radiation are necessary for some biological processes, but high levels can cause damage to cells and increase the risk of cancer.

5. Can background radiation be harmful to humans?

In small doses, background radiation is not harmful to humans. However, prolonged exposure to high levels of radiation can increase the risk of cancer and other health issues. It is important to limit exposure to sources of radiation and follow safety protocols when working with radioactive materials.

Similar threads

Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
39
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
886
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • Cosmology
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
29
Views
2K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
24
Views
2K
Back
Top