Baez week #207 is out (Dublin GR17 report)

  • Thread starter Thread starter marcus
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Report
Physics news on Phys.org
Or read it right here on PF: :smile:

https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=36781

- Warren
 
chroot said:
Or read it right here on PF: :smile:

Right you are! I first read it on PF, in fact. But the indentation
showing which blocks were direct quotes from hawking showed
up clearly in the original at Baez website so I decided to link to that. It is a
real convenience, I must say to have SPR readily available at PF!
 
BTW a piece that came out recently and should be of special interest to String Theory watchers was a memoir
by Sasha Polyakov

http://arxiv.org/hep-th/0407209

Confinement and Liberation
A. M. Polyakov
20 pages


"This is a review of topics which haunted me for the last 40 years, starting with spontaneous symmetry breaking and ending with gauge/string/space-time correspondence. While the first part of this article is mostly historical, the second contains some comments, opinions and conjectures which are new. This work is prepared for the volume ' Fifty Years of the Yang- Mills Theory' "
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I have been going through Polyakov's memoir, pointed to it by Peter Woit's link, and I am deeply impressed with the man and his work. That book "Fifty Years of Yang-Mills Theory" is going to be a must-buy. Imagine having the collected technical reminiscences of the Argonauts!
 
I seem to notice a buildup of papers like this: Detecting single gravitons with quantum sensing. (OK, old one.) Toward graviton detection via photon-graviton quantum state conversion Is this akin to “we’re soon gonna put string theory to the test”, or are these legit? Mind, I’m not expecting anyone to read the papers and explain them to me, but if one of you educated people already have an opinion I’d like to hear it. If not please ignore me. EDIT: I strongly suspect it’s bunk but...
I'm trying to understand the relationship between the Higgs mechanism and the concept of inertia. The Higgs field gives fundamental particles their rest mass, but it doesn't seem to directly explain why a massive object resists acceleration (inertia). My question is: How does the Standard Model account for inertia? Is it simply taken as a given property of mass, or is there a deeper connection to the vacuum structure? Furthermore, how does the Higgs mechanism relate to broader concepts like...
Back
Top