songoku said:
Just to clarify, based on Archimedes principle:
1. weight of displaced fluid = upthrust
2. volume of displaced fluid = volume of object immersed
1. weight of displaced fluid = upthrust ##\rightarrow## I think that's correct, it's also called "buoyancy"
2. volume of displaced fluid = volume of object
fully immersed ##\rightarrow## if the object floats on the surface, the weight of the displaced water volume corresponds to the weight of the floating object. And it is obvious that an object floating at the surface does not displace its entire volume...
songoku said:
I think weight of displaced fluid = weight of object when fully immersed but weight of displaced fluid ≠ weight of object when partially immersed?
Exactely the opposite:
Weight of the displaced fluid = weight of the floating object
Weight of displaced fluid ≠ weight of object sank to the ground
songoku said:
Another simple question: if the original reading of balance (container + water) = A, weight of object in air = B, weight of displaced water when object immersed = C, what will be the reading when the object is completely immersed without sinking?
So, the reading on balance = original reading + apparent weight of object = A + B - C? The teacher told me the answer is A + C
Just to be clear: Totally immersed, but not sank to the ground is only possible, if the object has exactely the same density as water. This is a very rare case (except you fill water into the container until water spills out) and it also is confusing and doesn't help to understand buoyancy. Therefore let's go with the two statements above:
1) Weight of the displaced fluid = weight of the floating object (partly or fully (very rare and special case) immersed)
2) Weight of the displaced fluid < weight of object sank to the ground
In the first case the displaced water exerts a force on the object exactely the same as its weight (##B=C##). All the water displaced by the body therefore has the same weight as the object you put into the container. If the displaced water spills out, there will be no difference in the reading of the balance (##A+C=A-C+B##).
In the second case the displaced water exerts a smaller force on the object than its weight (##B>C##). All the water displaced by the body therefore has a smaller weight than the object you put into the container. If the displaced water spills out, there will be a difference in the reading of the balance (##A+C<A-C+B##).
In the second case the body sinks to the ground. Why? Because the buoyancy (upthrust) isn't sufficiently high to keep it floating. The difference of the weights of the object and displaced water is then supported by the ground. This difference will give you a different reading. Imagine you put your bath tub filled with water on a balance. Now you put in a football made of gold (and the displaced water spills out). Do you think the balance's reading will increase or stay the same?
In a next step you put as much gold into the bath tub to displace all of the water. What do you think now about the balance's reading?
songoku said:
Before dropping: weight = buoyancy
After dropping: new weight = new buoyancy and new weight < original weight so new buoyancy < original buoyancy. This means that the boat will float more (displaced less water). Stone will displace some water and if we add new volume displaced by boat and volume displaced by stone, it will be equal to original volume of water displaced before stone is dropped, then water level does not rise?
The water level
decreases: If the stone floats with the boat it displaces water corresponding to its entire weight - it doesn't sink to the ground, does it? If you throw the stone into the water, it only displaces water corresponding to its volume, which is less water, since ##\rho_{water}<\rho_{stone}##. Less displaced water = lower water level.