Finding downward force on immersed object

  • Thread starter Thread starter member 731016
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Force
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on calculating the downward force, denoted as ##F_i##, on an immersed object in water. Participants apply Newton's second law to analyze forces acting on the object, including gravitational force ##F_g##, tension ##T##, and buoyancy ##B##. A key insight is that ##F_j##, the upward force from water, can be measured using a pressure sensor, allowing for the calculation of ##F_i##. The tension in the mesh is assumed to be negligible during the experiment, simplifying the calculations for determining object densities.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's second law of motion
  • Familiarity with buoyancy principles and Archimedes' principle
  • Knowledge of pressure measurement techniques, specifically using pressure sensors
  • Basic skills in data analysis for calculating densities
NEXT STEPS
  • Research methods for measuring buoyant forces using pressure sensors
  • Explore the application of Newton's laws in fluid mechanics
  • Learn about Archimedes' principle and its implications for density calculations
  • Investigate the effects of tension in submerged objects and how to account for it in experiments
USEFUL FOR

Students in physics or engineering, researchers conducting fluid dynamics experiments, and educators teaching principles of buoyancy and forces in fluids.

  • #61
haruspex said:
It does not say anything about water; it just says downward force.
(Now, if the object is less dense than water the net will indeed be exerting a downward force, but, from the equation Fi = Fg - B, Fi is measured positive up, so I assume all the objects naturally sink.)
It could be that the prof made a mistake and wrote downward instead of upward, or equivalently, "on the object" instead of "from the object". Either way, it is quite clear from the algebra that Fi is supposed to be the force the net exerts on the object.

It is also clear that this is not quite the same as the force recorded by the sensor, since that force (T?) includes the weight of the net (less any buoyant force on that). This makes me think the TA did not say, or did not mean, that T=0; merely that T is only very slightly different from Fi, so use the sensor reading as Fi and don't worry about T.
Thank you for you reply @haruspex!

I had a chat with the Professors today. Apparently, Fi is defined to be the upward force exerted by the force sensor and it not actually the downward force exerted by the water. They are going to change the lab script so that the definition of Fi will no longer say 'downward force on immersed object' which they agreed could imply the downward force from the water above the object. You are correct that ##B ≠ F_j - F_i##.

##F_i + B - mg = 0## and rearranging gives their expression.

Thank you and @kuruman very much for your help!
 
  • Like
Likes Lnewqban and kuruman
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #62
haruspex said:
The professor's statement that ##F_i = F_g - B## proves that ##B \neq F_j - F_i##.
Thank you for you help @haruspex!
 
  • #63
Callumnc1 said:
Thank you for your reply @kuruman!
Callumnc1 said:
Thank you for you help @haruspex!
What did we say about making posts just to say "thanks"?
 
  • Love
  • Like
Likes kuruman and member 731016

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
44
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K