Ball rolling down a slope problem: Find an expression for time taken

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving a metal ball rolling down a smooth inclined plane, specifically focusing on determining an expression for the time taken to roll a distance of s/2 from the top of the plane. The original poster expresses uncertainty in formulating this expression in terms of the total time t for distance s.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore different interpretations of the distance s/2 and its implications for time calculations. Some provide mathematical derivations based on kinematic equations, while others question the clarity of the original problem statement and the assumptions made regarding acceleration and forces acting on the ball.

Discussion Status

The discussion includes various approaches to derive the time expression, with some participants suggesting that the time for s/2 is not simply half of t due to the nature of acceleration. There is an ongoing exploration of the relationship between distance, time, and acceleration, with no explicit consensus reached yet.

Contextual Notes

Some participants note confusion regarding the notation used in the problem, particularly the representation of s/2. Additionally, there are references to external resources that may provide further context or examples related to Galileo's experiments with inclined planes.

Eobardrush
Messages
18
Reaction score
3
Homework Statement
Write an expression for the time taken, in terms of t, for the ball to roll a distance s 2 from the top of the plane.
Relevant Equations
s=ut+1/2(at^2)
Question:
Galileo released a metal ball from rest so that it could roll down a smooth inclined
plane. The time t taken to roll a distance s was measured. He repeated the
experiment, each time recording the time taken to travel a different fraction of the
distance s.

Write an expression for the time taken, in terms of t, for the ball to roll a distance s
2 from the top of the plane.

Answer:
√(1/2) t
OR
0.71tI am not sure how to really express this in terms of t. Never done a question like this before so I am pretty much stuck at step 1. If anyone could help me out will be appreciated
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The question is not clear What does s 2 mean? s/2?

The net force, hence acceleration, will be constant. Assume it starts from rest at time t=0.

Since ##s = \frac{1}{2}at^2## where s is the full distance travelled, then the time ##t_{s/2}## to go half that distance is:

##t_{s/2} =\sqrt{1/2}\sqrt{2s/a}## so:

##t_{s/2} = t/\sqrt{2}##
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Lnewqban
Please, see:
https://www.daviddarling.info/encyclopedia/G/GalileoG.html

Look for Example problem A at this page:
https://www.physicsclassroom.com/class/1DKin/Lesson-6/Kinematic-Equations-and-Free-Fall
70913688-3685-4ce8-80c0-87fde5e7d1e3?w=400&h=400.gif
 
Last edited:
Yeah S/2. The question I copy pasted somehow didnt include the slash. Also how does the "s" and "a" disappear just like that in the last expression you made. That part is a bit confusing. I do understand the 1st step now though which you made t the subject of the formula.
 
Eobardrush said:
Yeah S/2. The question I copy pasted somehow didnt include the slash. Also how does the "s" and "a" disappear just like that in the last expression you made. That part is a bit confusing. I do understand the 1st step now though which you made t the subject of the formula.
S and a are included in the expression for the time the ball takes to travel the whole distance S, which is

##t=\sqrt (2S/a)##

Then, the time for S/2 is the time used by the ball to cover half the total distance S, which is not 0.5t but 0.71t (the ball moved slower during the first half of the ramp).

Please, note that as the slope of the ramp gets smaller, the acceleration of the ball also decreases, as shown in animation of post #3 above.
That is because the direction of the force making the ball accelerate downhill is parallel to the slope and its magnitude is
##F=mg\sin(angle~of~slope)##
 
Last edited:
##t_{s/2}=\sqrt{(2(s/2))/a}=\sqrt{\frac{1}{2}(\frac{2s}{a})}=\sqrt{\frac{1}{2}}(\sqrt{\frac{2s}{a}})=\sqrt{\frac{1}{2}}(t)=\frac{t}{\sqrt{2}}##

AM
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Lnewqban
Yet another way to say the same thing:
##at^2=2s##
##at_{1/2}^2=s##
Divide the bottom equation by the first and solve for ##t_{1/2}.##
 
Lnewqban said:
That is because the direction of the force making the ball accelerate downhill is parallel to the slope and its magnitude is
##F=mg\sin(angle~of~slope)##
That is correct for a block sliding down a frictionless slope. However, OP indicates that we are talking about a ball rolling down a slope.

If one were trying to calculate the net force based on the slope angle, this would make a difference.

If, as here, we are merely concerned with proportionality, the magnitude of the net force is irrelevant and only the fact that it is constant enters in.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: bob012345 and berkeman

Similar threads

  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
12K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
6K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K