Ball rolling down a slope problem: Find an expression for time taken

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on deriving an expression for the time taken by a ball rolling down a slope to cover half the distance, denoted as s/2. The key formula used is t = √(2s/a), leading to the conclusion that the time for s/2 is t/√2, which approximates to 0.71t. Participants clarify that the ball's acceleration remains constant, and the time taken is not simply half of the total time due to the ball's varying speed on the slope. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding the relationship between distance, acceleration, and time in this context. Overall, the analysis highlights Galileo's foundational contributions to kinematics through experimental observation.
Eobardrush
Messages
18
Reaction score
3
Homework Statement
Write an expression for the time taken, in terms of t, for the ball to roll a distance s 2 from the top of the plane.
Relevant Equations
s=ut+1/2(at^2)
Question:
Galileo released a metal ball from rest so that it could roll down a smooth inclined
plane. The time t taken to roll a distance s was measured. He repeated the
experiment, each time recording the time taken to travel a different fraction of the
distance s.

Write an expression for the time taken, in terms of t, for the ball to roll a distance s
2 from the top of the plane.

Answer:
√(1/2) t
OR
0.71tI am not sure how to really express this in terms of t. Never done a question like this before so I am pretty much stuck at step 1. If anyone could help me out will be appreciated
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The question is not clear What does s 2 mean? s/2?

The net force, hence acceleration, will be constant. Assume it starts from rest at time t=0.

Since ##s = \frac{1}{2}at^2## where s is the full distance travelled, then the time ##t_{s/2}## to go half that distance is:

##t_{s/2} =\sqrt{1/2}\sqrt{2s/a}## so:

##t_{s/2} = t/\sqrt{2}##
 
  • Like
Likes Lnewqban
Please, see:
https://www.daviddarling.info/encyclopedia/G/GalileoG.html

Look for Example problem A at this page:
https://www.physicsclassroom.com/class/1DKin/Lesson-6/Kinematic-Equations-and-Free-Fall
70913688-3685-4ce8-80c0-87fde5e7d1e3?w=400&h=400.gif
 
Last edited:
Yeah S/2. The question I copy pasted somehow didnt include the slash. Also how does the "s" and "a" disappear just like that in the last expression you made. That part is a bit confusing. I do understand the 1st step now though which you made t the subject of the formula.
 
Eobardrush said:
Yeah S/2. The question I copy pasted somehow didnt include the slash. Also how does the "s" and "a" disappear just like that in the last expression you made. That part is a bit confusing. I do understand the 1st step now though which you made t the subject of the formula.
S and a are included in the expression for the time the ball takes to travel the whole distance S, which is

##t=\sqrt (2S/a)##

Then, the time for S/2 is the time used by the ball to cover half the total distance S, which is not 0.5t but 0.71t (the ball moved slower during the first half of the ramp).

Please, note that as the slope of the ramp gets smaller, the acceleration of the ball also decreases, as shown in animation of post #3 above.
That is because the direction of the force making the ball accelerate downhill is parallel to the slope and its magnitude is
##F=mg\sin(angle~of~slope)##
 
Last edited:
##t_{s/2}=\sqrt{(2(s/2))/a}=\sqrt{\frac{1}{2}(\frac{2s}{a})}=\sqrt{\frac{1}{2}}(\sqrt{\frac{2s}{a}})=\sqrt{\frac{1}{2}}(t)=\frac{t}{\sqrt{2}}##

AM
 
  • Like
Likes Lnewqban
Yet another way to say the same thing:
##at^2=2s##
##at_{1/2}^2=s##
Divide the bottom equation by the first and solve for ##t_{1/2}.##
 
Lnewqban said:
That is because the direction of the force making the ball accelerate downhill is parallel to the slope and its magnitude is
##F=mg\sin(angle~of~slope)##
That is correct for a block sliding down a frictionless slope. However, OP indicates that we are talking about a ball rolling down a slope.

If one were trying to calculate the net force based on the slope angle, this would make a difference.

If, as here, we are merely concerned with proportionality, the magnitude of the net force is irrelevant and only the fact that it is constant enters in.
 
  • Like
Likes bob012345 and berkeman
Back
Top