Banked Roadway Design for Ice Conditions: Solving for Optimal Angle

  • Thread starter Thread starter scharry03
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physics
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the design of a banked roadway to ensure vehicles can navigate a curve without relying on friction, specifically under icy conditions. The designated speed for the curve is 13.4 m/s with a radius of 35.0 m. Key equations used include nsin(theta) = mv²/r and ncos(theta) = mg, which help determine the optimal banking angle. Participants clarify that centripetal acceleration is not parallel to the slope, emphasizing the importance of defining an axis parallel to the slope for accurate calculations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of centripetal acceleration and its relation to banking angles
  • Familiarity with Newton's laws of motion
  • Knowledge of trigonometric functions in physics
  • Ability to apply equations of motion in curved paths
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the principles of banked curves in civil engineering
  • Learn about the effects of friction on vehicle dynamics
  • Study the application of Newton's laws in non-inertial frames
  • Explore advanced topics in road design for varying weather conditions
USEFUL FOR

Civil engineers, transportation planners, and students studying roadway design and vehicle dynamics will benefit from this discussion.

scharry03
Messages
12
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


A civil engineer wishes to redesign the curved roadway in Interactive Example 5.7 in such a way that a car will not have to rely on friction to round the curve without skidding. In other words, a car moving at the desig- nated speed can negotiate the curve even when the road is covered with ice. Such a curve is usually banked, meaning that the roadway is tilted toward the inside of the curve. Suppose the designated speed for the curve is to be 13.4 m/s (30.0 mi/h) and the radius of the curve is 35.0 m. At what angle should the curve be banked?

5-13.gif


Homework Equations


nsin(theta) = mv2 /r
ncos(theta) = mg
tan(theta) = v2/rg

The Attempt at a Solution


I had thought that looking at horizontal movement on the slope you would use mgsin(theta) = mv2/r, so that the force is parallel with the slope. Why are we not doing this? Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Wouldn't it depend on how you measured r?
 
You can assume r is measured to the COM of the car.

scharry03 said:

The Attempt at a Solution


I had thought that looking at horizontal movement on the slope you would use mgsin(theta) = mv2/r, so that the force is parallel with the slope. Why are we not doing this? Thanks.

For problems like this it is often easier to define an axis parallel to the slope and work that way. Then you can ignore the normal force as it makes no contribution to what you are interested in; what theta is when all forces parallel to the slope sum to zero.

With that said, the force due to the centripetal acceleration is not parallel to the slope, it's horizontal. so your expression mgsin(theta) = mv2/r will not give the correct answer. Those two force vectors are not collinear.
 
Okay, I didn't realize that centripetal acceleration wasn't parallel with the slope, but now that I think about it, that makes complete sense. Thanks!
 
Have a look at the sheet i have attached, note that its an intuitive solution.
 

Attachments

dean barry said:
Have a look at the sheet i have attached, note that its an intuitive solution.
For neutral banking, the banking will be perpendicular to the force resultant (F3)
You should clarify that that is using the centrifugal force view, not an inertial frame.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
13K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
21
Views
10K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
9K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
13K