Barriers & Tunneling: Find No Reflection & Max. Reflection Thresholds

  • Thread starter Thread starter zbhest123
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Tunneling
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the calculation of barrier thickness for electrons approaching a potential barrier of height 3.8 eV. The key equations used include the probability of transmission T and the relationship kL=nπ, where k is derived from the electron's energy and the potential barrier. The correct barrier thickness for no reflection is determined to be L=0.229 nm, corresponding to integer multiples of this value. The solution emphasizes the importance of correctly interpreting the sine function in relation to the wave vector k.

PREREQUISITES
  • Quantum mechanics fundamentals
  • Understanding of potential barriers and tunneling
  • Familiarity with wave functions and probability amplitudes
  • Basic algebra and trigonometry
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the Schrödinger equation for potential barriers
  • Learn about quantum tunneling and its applications in semiconductor physics
  • Explore the implications of barrier thickness on electron transmission probabilities
  • Investigate the role of integer multiples in wave mechanics
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those specializing in quantum mechanics, semiconductor technology, and materials science.

zbhest123
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
1. Let 11.0-eV electrons approach a potential barrier of height 3.8 eV.
2. (a) For what barrier thickness is there no reflection? (b) For what barrier thickness is the reflection a maximum?
3. For part (a) I tried using kL=npi where k=sqrt(2m(E-V))/hbar, because this is where the Probability of transmission T=1.
The equation for probability of transmission is given by T=(1+V^2sin^2(kL)/(4E(E-V)))^-1. V is the potential barrier, 3.8 eV
I solved for L, getting: L=npi*hbar/sqrt(2m(E-V)), but I still don't know n. (n is an integer) And when ignoring n I get the wrong answer.
The answer I get is 7.623e-19.
The answer in the book is L=.229nm or any integer multiple thereof.
I have no idea what to do from here, I also multiplied the top and the bottom by c=3e8 due to electron mass m=.511e6 eV/c^2.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
zbhest123 said:
I solved for L, getting: L=npi*hbar/sqrt(2m(E-V)), but I still don't know n. (n is an integer) And when ignoring n I get the wrong answer.

n is just any integer, because if pi*hbar/sqrt(2m(E-V)) satisfies the equation sin(k1*L)=0, so do all of its integer multiples.

The answer I get is 7.623e-19.
The answer in the book is L=.229nm or any integer multiple thereof.
[/b]

Check over your algebra. Did you remember to convert E and V to joules?
 
Nevermind! I got it using the equation: T=(1+V^2sin^2(kL)/(4E(E-V)))^-1

Simplifying to sin^2(kL)=0

Originally I put it in my calculator to find arcsin(0) equal to 0. It was then pointed out to me that it can also equal pi. So I used Lk=pi, simplified to L=pi/k, which gave me a correct answer.

Thanks!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
7K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
5K