Base sizing of a robotic arm for maximum stability

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the base sizing of a robotic arm to ensure maximum stability, emphasizing the use of an 8mm thick steel base anchored with eight peripheral bolts. Participants highlight the importance of calculating the bending moment at the base, which is influenced by the weight of the robotic arm and its payload. Key considerations include the strength of the bolts, the base diameter, and the need for triangular gusset plates, which were ultimately deemed unnecessary due to design constraints. The conversation underscores the necessity of understanding the moment-to-strength ratio for effective base sizing.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of bending moment calculations in mechanical structures
  • Knowledge of bolt strength and clamping force principles
  • Familiarity with static equilibrium in rigid body mechanics
  • Experience with structural design considerations for robotic applications
NEXT STEPS
  • Research "Calculating bending moments in mechanical structures" for foundational knowledge
  • Study "Bolt strength and clamping force calculations" to understand load distribution
  • Explore "Static equilibrium principles in engineering" for insights on force balance
  • Investigate "Robotic arm design considerations" to apply theoretical knowledge practically
USEFUL FOR

Mechanical engineers, robotic system designers, and structural engineers involved in the design and stability analysis of robotic arms and similar mechanical systems will benefit from this discussion.

  • #31
I was going to consider both case. You think an advanced fea simulation is the way to go?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
Aaron Mac said:
I was going to consider both case. You think an advanced fea simulation is the way to go?
First figure out why you may wish to choose one base over another. If you aren't bolting it down then the base needs massive enough (and/or with some footprint) so the robot doesn't tip during its maneuvers. You can solve that problem with Dynamics. If you want a lighter weight solution that doesn't need to be "moved" you can focus on designing the bracket, bolts, and substrate.
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K