Aaron Mac
- 26
- 1
I was going to consider both case. You think an advanced fea simulation is the way to go?
The discussion focuses on the base sizing of a robotic arm to ensure maximum stability, emphasizing the use of an 8mm thick steel base anchored with eight peripheral bolts. Participants highlight the importance of calculating the bending moment at the base, which is influenced by the weight of the robotic arm and its payload. Key considerations include the strength of the bolts, the base diameter, and the need for triangular gusset plates, which were ultimately deemed unnecessary due to design constraints. The conversation underscores the necessity of understanding the moment-to-strength ratio for effective base sizing.
PREREQUISITESMechanical engineers, robotic system designers, and structural engineers involved in the design and stability analysis of robotic arms and similar mechanical systems will benefit from this discussion.
First figure out why you may wish to choose one base over another. If you aren't bolting it down then the base needs massive enough (and/or with some footprint) so the robot doesn't tip during its maneuvers. You can solve that problem with Dynamics. If you want a lighter weight solution that doesn't need to be "moved" you can focus on designing the bracket, bolts, and substrate.Aaron Mac said:I was going to consider both case. You think an advanced fea simulation is the way to go?