Basic Electric Field in Conductor Principles

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the principles of electric fields in conductors, specifically addressing a scenario involving a point charge q within a cavity of a conductor. It is established that the net charge on the cavity wall must be -q, while the outer surface of the conductor will carry a charge of Q0 + q, ensuring the overall charge remains Q0. Furthermore, it is clarified that every electric field line in the cavity originates from the point charge and terminates on the cavity wall, as dictated by Gauss's Law and the properties of electric fields in electrostatic equilibrium.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Gauss's Law in electrostatics
  • Knowledge of electric fields and equipotential surfaces
  • Familiarity with the concept of charge distribution in conductors
  • Basic principles of electromagnetism as outlined in "Electromagnetism: Pollack and Stump"
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of Gauss's Law on electric fields in various geometries
  • Explore the behavior of electric fields in conductors and insulators
  • Learn about equipotential surfaces and their relationship with electric fields
  • Investigate the concept of charge induction in conductors with cavities
USEFUL FOR

Students of electromagnetism, physics educators, and anyone seeking to deepen their understanding of electric fields in conductive materials.

FallenLeibniz
Messages
86
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


The following is a small concept exercise from an. EM text (Electromagnetism: Pollack and Stump). I believe I have the explanations correct, but am just looking for "peer-review" as they seem "hand-wavy":

Suppose a conductor has a cavity inside it, and there is a point charge q somewhere in the cavity. Prove that the net charge on the wall of the cavity must be -q. If the net charge of the conductor is Q0[\SUB], what is the net charge on its outer surface? Why must every field line in the cavity begin on q and on the cavity wall? (Hint: For the last statement, use the fact that ##\oint\vec{E}\cdot d\vec{l}## )

Homework Equations


[/B]Other than the one in the statement of the problem, nothing really as it is a concept question more than anything.

The Attempt at a Solution



a) [/B]Let ##\vec{E}_{int}## be the field inside the conductor material (which is of course ##\vec{0}##). Let S be a gaussian surface that is large enough to both enclose the cavity and a small portion of the conductive material. Since ##\vec{E}_{int}\cdot d\vec{A}## at S is zero, it follows from Gauss's Law that the enclosed charge is zero. Taken with the fact that a conductor may have no overall charge density inside itself when in equilibrium except at surface boundaries, the wall must have -q.

b) ##Q_0## +q. As before stated, a conductor may only carry charge on its surface boundaries. Since we have established that -q is on one boundary inside the conductor, ##Q_0## +q must be on the outside for the net charge of the conductor to be ##Q_0## only. Note that this also finds validity when considering an empty cavity.

c) To start, a field must have a source. Since the only source for the field in the cavity is the charge, it must start there. Note that the fact that the closed integral of the dot product is zero means that any field that meets the boundaries of a curve must do so perpendicularly. Now the field can not terminate inside the cavity since it can not just arbitrarily terminate in mid air and the field can not travel through or terminate in the conductor since the internal conductor field must be zero. Thus the field must terminate on the cavity boundary.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
FallenLeibniz said:

Homework Statement


The following is a small concept exercise from an. EM text (Electromagnetism: Pollack and Stump). I believe I have the explanations correct, but am just looking for "peer-review" as they seem "hand-wavy":

(a) Suppose a conductor has a cavity inside it, and there is a point charge q somewhere in the cavity. Prove that the net charge on the wall of the cavity must be -q.
(b) If the net charge of the conductor is Q0, what is the net charge on its outer surface?
(c) Why must every field line in the cavity begin on q and on the cavity wall? (Hint: For the last statement, use the fact that ##\oint\vec{E}\cdot d\vec{l}## = 0. )

Homework Equations


[/B]Other than the one in the statement of the problem, nothing really as it is a concept question more than anything.

The Attempt at a Solution



a) [/B]Let ##\vec{E}_{int}## be the field inside the conductor material (which is of course ##\vec{0}##). Let S be a gaussian surface that is large enough to both enclose the cavity and a small portion of the conductive material. Since ##\vec{E}_{int}\cdot d\vec{A}## at S is zero, it follows from Gauss's Law that the enclosed charge is zero. Taken with the fact that a conductor may have no overall charge density inside itself when in equilibrium except at surface boundaries, the wall must have -q.

b) ##Q_0## +q. As before stated, a conductor may only carry charge on its surface boundaries. Since we have established that -q is on one boundary inside the conductor, ##Q_0## +q must be on the outside for the net charge of the conductor to be ##Q_0## only. Note that this also finds validity when considering an empty cavity.

c) To start, a field must have a source. Since the only source for the field in the cavity is the charge, it must start there. Note that the fact that the closed integral of the dot product is zero means that any field that meets the boundaries of a curve must do so perpendicularly. Now the field can not terminate inside the cavity since it can not just arbitrarily terminate in mid air and the field can not travel through or terminate in the conductor since the internal conductor field must be zero. Thus the field must terminate on the cavity boundary.

I've rewritten your problem statement slightly for clarity.
I agree with (a) and (b) and am not sure of (c), especially the statement that " ... the fact that the closed integral of the dot product is zero means that any field that meets the boundaries of a curve must do so perpendicularly." That integral is zero anywhere in an electrostatic environment. The reason the E field is perpendicular to the metallic surface is that the metallic surface is an equipotential and the E field is always perpendicular to the equipotential surface. The rest of your statement sounds right. Maybe someone else will comment more on this.
 

Similar threads

Replies
23
Views
5K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
6K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K