Basic numeracy - exact meaning of accurate to one part in a thousand

  • Thread starter Thread starter tomwilliam2
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the interpretation of "accurate to one part in a thousand" in the context of perturbation theory applied to the Coulomb model for the ground-state energy of a hydrogen atom. The consensus is that this accuracy implies the correction term, denoted as δE, must be less than ±0.0005 J to maintain the integrity of the Coulomb model's accuracy. This ensures that the correction does not round up to ±0.001 J, which would violate the specified accuracy. The equation governing this relationship is E = E_c + δE.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of perturbation theory in quantum mechanics
  • Familiarity with the Coulomb model of hydrogen atom energy levels
  • Basic knowledge of numerical accuracy and significant figures
  • Ability to interpret mathematical inequalities and their implications
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of numerical accuracy in scientific calculations
  • Explore perturbation theory applications in quantum mechanics
  • Learn about significant figures and rounding rules in physics
  • Investigate the Coulomb potential and its role in atomic physics
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those focusing on quantum mechanics and atomic theory, as well as anyone dealing with numerical accuracy in scientific computations.

tomwilliam2
Messages
117
Reaction score
2
Basic numeracy - exact meaning of "accurate to one part in a thousand"

Homework Statement



I have a standard Coulomb model for the ground-state energy of a hydrogen atom. I have used peturbation theory to calculate a (fictitious) first order correction to the model, which contains a constant a.
I now have to find the largest value of a which will be consistent with the fact that the Coulomb model is accurate to one part in a thousand.
It's a basic numeracy problem, despite being a complicated topic. Does accurate to one part in a thousand mean that the correction shouldn't contribute more than +/- 0.001 J to the energy calculated using the Coulomb model, or does it mean it shouldn't add more than +/- 0.00049999 J?
A bit basic, I know, but I don't want to fail at this final hurdle.
Thanks in advance.

Homework Equations



##E = E_c + \delta E##

The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
tomwilliam2 said:

Homework Statement



I have a standard Coulomb model for the ground-state energy of a hydrogen atom. I have used peturbation theory to calculate a (fictitious) first order correction to the model, which contains a constant a.
I now have to find the largest value of a which will be consistent with the fact that the Coulomb model is accurate to one part in a thousand.
It's a basic numeracy problem, despite being a complicated topic. Does accurate to one part in a thousand mean that the correction shouldn't contribute more than +/- 0.001 J to the energy calculated using the Coulomb model, or does it mean it shouldn't add more than +/- 0.00049999 J?
Why "-.00049999"? Why exactly 4 "9"s? "Accurate to one part in a thousand" means within \pm 0.0005[/tex].<br /> <br /> <blockquote data-attributes="" data-quote="" data-source="" class="bbCodeBlock bbCodeBlock--expandable bbCodeBlock--quote js-expandWatch"> <div class="bbCodeBlock-content"> <div class="bbCodeBlock-expandContent js-expandContent "> A bit basic, I know, but I don&#039;t want to fail at this final hurdle.<br /> Thanks in advance.<br /> <br /> <h2>Homework Equations</h2><br /> <br /> ##E = E_c + \delta E##<br /> <br /> <br /> <h2>The Attempt at a Solution</h2> </div> </div> </blockquote>
 
Well, perhaps that was a bit sloppy. My point was that shouldn't it be ##\delta E < 0.0005## (instead of ##\delta E \leq 0.0005##) because if the correction was actually 0.0005 then it could be rounded up to 0.001, thereby altering the one part in a thousand?
I don't know if I've explained my dilemma properly there...
 
One part in a thousand means ##|\delta E/E_c|## needs to be less than 1/1000.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K