Basis for set of 2x2 complex symmetric matrices

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves determining the basis and dimension of the set of all 2x2 complex symmetric matrices. Participants are exploring how the inclusion of complex coefficients affects the basis compared to the case with real coefficients.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Some participants attempt to identify a basis for the space of 2x2 complex symmetric matrices, initially considering a basis derived from the real case. They question whether additional matrices are needed to account for complex coefficients.
  • Others suggest that complex scalar multiplication could allow for a smaller basis, but there is uncertainty about whether this would adequately span the space.
  • Participants discuss the implications of needing separate basis vectors for real and imaginary components and whether multiplying by "i" could simplify the basis.
  • There is a recurring question about whether the vector space is defined over the reals or complexes, which influences the basis structure.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants exploring different interpretations of the problem. Some guidance has been offered regarding the use of complex numbers in forming linear combinations, but no consensus has been reached on the final basis or dimension. The need for clarification on the field over which the vector space is defined remains a point of contention.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the problem is incompletely specified, particularly regarding whether the vector space is over the real or complex numbers, which affects the basis and dimension considerations.

csnsc14320
Messages
57
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



Give the basis and dimension of the set of all 2x2 complex symmetric matrices.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I know that if the coefficients were real, then I could just have the basis

<br /> \left(<br /> \begin{array}{cc}<br /> 1 &amp; 0\\<br /> 0 &amp; 0<br /> \end{array}<br /> \right),<br /> <br /> \left(<br /> \begin{array}{cc}<br /> 0 &amp; 1\\<br /> 1 &amp; 0<br /> \end{array}<br /> \right),<br /> <br /> \left(<br /> \begin{array}{cc}<br /> 0 &amp; 0\\<br /> 0 &amp; 1<br /> \end{array}<br /> \right)<br />

but if the entries of the matrix can be in the form of a+bi, where a and b are real numbers, do I need three SEPARATE matrices with "i" coefficients or can i combine them somehow?

i.e., extend the dimension to 6 by:

<br /> \left(<br /> \begin{array}{cc}<br /> i &amp; 0\\<br /> 0 &amp; 0<br /> \end{array}<br /> \right)<br /> <br /> \left(<br /> \begin{array}{cc}<br /> 0 &amp; i\\<br /> i &amp; 0<br /> \end{array}<br /> \right)<br /> <br /> \left(<br /> \begin{array}{cc}<br /> 0 &amp; 0\\<br /> 0 &amp; i<br /> \end{array}<br /> \right)<br />

and thus my dimension would be 6?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think that you can combine them with complex scalar multiplication.

e.g.

<br /> \left(<br /> \begin{array}{cc}<br /> i &amp; 0\\<br /> 0 &amp; 0<br /> \end{array}<br /> \right)=i<br /> \left(<br /> \begin{array}{cc}<br /> 1 &amp; 0\\<br /> 0 &amp; 0<br /> \end{array}<br /> \right)
 
aPhilosopher said:
I think that you can combine them with complex scalar multiplication.

e.g.

<br /> \left(<br /> \begin{array}{cc}<br /> i &amp; 0\\<br /> 0 &amp; 0<br /> \end{array}<br /> \right)=i<br /> \left(<br /> \begin{array}{cc}<br /> 1 &amp; 0\\<br /> 0 &amp; 0<br /> \end{array}<br /> \right)

but then that wouldn't span the space?

if i wanted the matrix \left(<br /> \begin{array}{cc}<br /> 1 &amp; 3-2i\\<br /> 3-2i &amp; 16-i<br /> \end{array}<br /> \right)

wouldnt i need:
<br /> \left(<br /> \begin{array}{cc}<br /> 1 &amp; 0\\<br /> 0 &amp; 0<br /> \end{array}<br /> \right) + 3\left(<br /> \begin{array}{cc}<br /> 0 &amp; 1\\<br /> 1 &amp; 0<br /> \end{array}<br /> \right) - 2\left(<br /> \begin{array}{cc}<br /> 0 &amp; i\\<br /> i &amp; 0<br /> \end{array}<br /> \right) + 16\left(<br /> \begin{array}{cc}<br /> 0 &amp; 0\\<br /> 0 &amp; 1<br /> \end{array}<br /> \right) -\left(<br /> \begin{array}{cc}<br /> 0 &amp; 0\\<br /> 0 &amp; i<br /> \end{array}<br /> \right)

I don't see a way of obtaining this matrix without having a 6 dimensional basis where the 1's and i's are separated?
 
csnsc14320 said:
but then that wouldn't span the space?

if i wanted the matrix \left(<br /> \begin{array}{cc}<br /> 1 &amp; 3-2i\\<br /> 3-2i &amp; 16-i<br /> \end{array}<br /> \right)

wouldnt i need:
<br /> \left(<br /> \begin{array}{cc}<br /> 1 &amp; 0\\<br /> 0 &amp; 0<br /> \end{array}<br /> \right) + 3\left(<br /> \begin{array}{cc}<br /> 0 &amp; 1\\<br /> 1 &amp; 0<br /> \end{array}<br /> \right) - 2\left(<br /> \begin{array}{cc}<br /> 0 &amp; i\\<br /> i &amp; 0<br /> \end{array}<br /> \right) + 16\left(<br /> \begin{array}{cc}<br /> 0 &amp; 0\\<br /> 0 &amp; 1<br /> \end{array}<br /> \right) -\left(<br /> \begin{array}{cc}<br /> 0 &amp; 0\\<br /> 0 &amp; i<br /> \end{array}<br /> \right)

I don't see a way of obtaining this matrix without having a 6 dimensional basis where the 1's and i's are separated?

wait a minute... multiplying by "i" is allowed isn't it? in which case I would have:

<br /> i^3<br /> \left(<br /> \begin{array}{cc}<br /> i &amp; 0\\<br /> 0 &amp; 0<br /> \end{array}<br /> \right) + 3i^3\left(<br /> \begin{array}{cc}<br /> 0 &amp; i\\<br /> i &amp; 0<br /> \end{array}<br /> \right) - 2\left(<br /> \begin{array}{cc}<br /> 0 &amp; i\\<br /> i &amp; 0<br /> \end{array}<br /> \right) + 16i^3\left(<br /> \begin{array}{cc}<br /> 0 &amp; 0\\<br /> 0 &amp; i<br /> \end{array}<br /> \right) -\left(<br /> \begin{array}{cc}<br /> 0 &amp; 0\\<br /> 0 &amp; i<br /> \end{array}<br /> \right)

in which case, my dimension would be 3, or just the three matrices with i's since i can obtain the 1's by a multiplication of i^3?

i think that's w hat you were getting at aPhiliosopher - i don't think i understood what you meant the first time i read it
 
<br /> <br /> \left(<br /> \begin{array}{cc}<br /> 1 &amp; 3-2i\\<br /> 3-2i &amp; 16-i<br /> \end{array}<br /> \right)<br /> =<br /> <br /> \left(<br /> \begin{array}{cc}<br /> 1 &amp; 0\\<br /> 0 &amp; 0<br /> \end{array}<br /> \right) + (3 - 2i)<br /> <br /> <br /> \left(<br /> \begin{array}{cc}<br /> 0 &amp; 1\\<br /> 1 &amp; 0<br /> \end{array}<br /> \right) + (16 - i)<br /> <br /> \left(<br /> \begin{array}{cc}<br /> 0 &amp; 0\\<br /> 0 &amp; 1<br /> \end{array}<br /> \right)<br />
 
aPhilosopher said:
<br /> <br /> \left(<br /> \begin{array}{cc}<br /> 1 &amp; 3-2i\\<br /> 3-2i &amp; 16-i<br /> \end{array}<br /> \right)<br /> =<br /> <br /> \left(<br /> \begin{array}{cc}<br /> 1 &amp; 0\\<br /> 0 &amp; 0<br /> \end{array}<br /> \right) + (3 - 2i)<br /> <br /> <br /> \left(<br /> \begin{array}{cc}<br /> 0 &amp; 1\\<br /> 1 &amp; 0<br /> \end{array}<br /> \right) + (16 - i)<br /> <br /> \left(<br /> \begin{array}{cc}<br /> 0 &amp; 0\\<br /> 0 &amp; 1<br /> \end{array}<br /> \right)<br />

i make things too difficult :p

so just the 1's would work then. i forgot about multiplying by i.

thanks!
 
What is the basis of the vector space over the field of reals?
 
Phrak said:
What is the basis of the vector space over the field of reals?


<br /> \left(<br /> \begin{array}{cc}<br /> 1 &amp; 0\\<br /> 0 &amp; 0<br /> \end{array}<br /> \right),<br /> <br /> \left(<br /> \begin{array}{cc}<br /> 0 &amp; 1\\<br /> 1 &amp; 0<br /> \end{array}<br /> \right),<br /> <br /> \left(<br /> \begin{array}{cc}<br /> 0 &amp; 0\\<br /> 0 &amp; 1<br /> \end{array}<br /> \right)<br />

which should also be the basis over the complex too since i can just multiply by multiples of i as well
 
Nooooo, that's not a basis over the reals.

You had it right before I got here if you want it over the reals.

I shouldn't have assumed it was over the complex field.
 
  • #10
aPhilosopher said:
Nooooo, that's not a basis over the reals.

You had it right before I got here if you want it over the reals.

Thanks, aPhilosoper. I wasn't really sure. :smile:
 
  • #11
aPhilosopher said:
Nooooo, that's not a basis over the reals.

You had it right before I got here if you want it over the reals.

I shouldn't have assumed it was over the complex field.

i want it over the complex?
 
  • #12
Well, you're going to have to tell me. Technically, this is an incompletely specified problem. Is this vector space over the real or complex numbers? I would assume complex but don't really have a clue because it could go either way. At any rate, that question gives you your answer to what scalars are allowed in linear combinations. If you can't use complex numbers, then you have to have the three additional basis vectors that are just i times the first three.Thanks for pointing this out Phrack.
 
  • #13
aPhilosopher said:
Well, you're going to have to tell me. Technically, this is an incompletely specified problem. Is this vector space over the real or complex numbers? I would assume complex but don't really have a clue because it could go either way. At any rate, that question gives you your answer to what scalars are allowed in linear combinations. If you can't use complex numbers, then you have to have the three additional basis vectors that are just i times the first three.


Thanks for pointing this out Phrack.

its a vector space over the complex :D

and can have complex entries
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
10K
Replies
0
Views
995
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K