Basis vectors and abstract index notation

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
1 reply · 2K views
branislav
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
First of all, I'd like to say hi to all the peole here on the forum!

Now to my question:

When reading some general relativity articles, I came upon this strange notation:

T[itex]^{a}[/itex][itex]_{b}[/itex] = C(dt)[itex]^{a}[/itex](∂[itex]_{t}[/itex])[itex]_{b}[/itex] + D(∂[itex]_{t}[/itex])[itex]^{a}[/itex](dt)[itex]_{b}[/itex]. Can someone please explain to me what this means? Clearly the author is trying to use the abstract index notation but I'm used to think of dx[itex]^{i}[/itex] as the covector basis and ∂[itex]_{i}[/itex] as the vector basis thus you're not allowed to change the co- or contravariance of these in an expression.

Thank you,
Branislav
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Follow the usual rules for raising and lowering indices, e.g.[tex] (dt)_a = g_{ab}\,(dt)^b[/tex]