Batteries and Radiation: Exploring the Kinetic and Electromagnetic Theories

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter reeckstar
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Batteries Radiation
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the question of why batteries do not emit significant electromagnetic radiation and lose their charge quickly, with references to kinetic and electromagnetic theories. Participants explore the motion of ions within batteries and the implications of this motion on charge retention and radiation emission.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions why batteries do not emit significant electromagnetic radiation despite the constant motion of ions, suggesting that accelerating ions should lead to radiation emission.
  • Another participant argues that as long as the positive and negative terminals are insulated, the charge cannot change, implying that motion does not affect charge retention as suggested.
  • A later reply clarifies that electromagnetic radiation itself does not carry electric charge away from a source, challenging the initial premise about radiation and charge loss.
  • Some participants discuss the speed of ion movement, with one stating that ion movement is relatively slow and questioning why other objects, like keys on a keyboard, do not emit radiation when in motion.
  • Another participant raises the point that current in a battery circuit may emit electromagnetic radiation, but questions the conditions under which this occurs.
  • One participant proposes a revised question about the implications of ion acceleration on the state of the ionic liquid/gel in batteries.
  • Another suggests that while ions may emit some electromagnetic radiation when changing direction, this energy would likely be absorbed by other atoms, contributing to heat rather than leading to significant charge loss.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the relationship between ion motion, electromagnetic radiation, and charge retention in batteries. There is no consensus on the mechanisms involved or the implications of the discussed theories.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention various assumptions about ion behavior and the nature of electromagnetic radiation, but these assumptions remain unresolved and depend on specific definitions and contexts.

reeckstar
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Why don't batteries give off a significant amount of electromagnetic radiation and lose their charge quickly? I was thinking about kinetic theory and electromagnetic theory, and it seems that the ions in the battery ought to be accelerating quite a bit since they are in constant motion and bumping into walls and other particles (changing speed and direction). Why don't these ions give off their charge when they accelerate? Shouldn't this cause the battery to lose its charge rather quickly? :shy:
 
Science news on Phys.org
As long as the + and - are insulated from each other, there is no way or the charge to change. Motion itself doesn't have the effect your describing.
 
reeckstar said:
Why don't batteries give off a significant amount of electromagnetic radiation and lose their charge quickly? I was thinking about kinetic theory and electromagnetic theory, and it seems that the ions in the battery ought to be accelerating quite a bit since they are in constant motion and bumping into walls and other particles (changing speed and direction). Why don't these ions give off their charge when they accelerate? Shouldn't this cause the battery to lose its charge rather quickly? :shy:

Without entering into the subject of charge movement in a battery:

Electromagnetic radiation has no electric charge, and therefore doesn't transport electric charge away from a radiating charge.
 
Thanks for clearing that up, mathman and torquil. What about the first part of the question? Why don't they give off a significant amount of electromagnetic radiation (accelerating ions give off electromagnetic radiation, right?)?
 
Have you thought about exactly what an ion is??
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ion

ions in the battery ought to be accelerating quite a bit since they are in constant motion and bumping into walls and other particles (changing speed and direction).

Ion movement is actually rather slow.

Does an atom of any material "...give off a significant amount of electromagnetic radiation and lose ...(any) charge quickly?

How about an ion anywhere?

Why don't they keys on your computer keyboard emit radiation when you tap them??

And how about current in a battery circuit: why doesn't it "..give off a significant amount of electromagnetic radiation and lose ...charge quickly?..." Remember the power loss here is a simple I2R.
 
Naty1 said:
Ion movement is actually rather slow.

Why don't they keys on your computer keyboard emit radiation when you tap them??

And how about current in a battery circuit: why doesn't iy "..give off a significant amount of electromagnetic radiation and lose ...charge quickly?..." Remember the power loss here is a simple I2R.

I thought a current does give off a significant amount of electromagnetic radiation?

Also, what do you mean by ions moving slow? Aren't they just as fast as any other atom, just charged?
 
Last edited:
From what has already been said, let me clarify and change the question:

Why don't batteries give off a significant amount of electromagnetic radiation (from the acceleration of ions--implication of electromagnetic theory and kinetic theory) and then change state due to the loss of energy (when I say change state the subject is the ionic liquid/gel)?
 
I suppose an ion, when changing dirrection, would give off a bit of EM radiation. The source of the energy would be the KE of the ion. It would likely get absorbed by another atom in the battery and so be just a means of heat movement. If it escaped the battery and caused the average temperature of the battery to drop by a tiny fraction of a degree the battery would simply absorb a tiny amount of heat from its environment and stay the same temperature as the environment.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
5K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
12K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
7K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K