Beam current of positrons and electrons

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the beam current of positrons and electrons through a series of steps involving energy and wavelength calculations. The initial step correctly identifies the energy from the annihilation process using E=2mc^2. However, confusion arises regarding the use of photon wavelength for positrons and the appropriate voltage to consider. The calculation for the number of positrons per second needed is clarified as P/E, where P is power and E is energy from the first step. It is emphasized that the beam current should only account for positrons, as electrons are not part of the beam.
songoku
Messages
2,488
Reaction score
393
Homework Statement
a. If a positron beam were to be used as an annihilation cutting tool, calculate the beam current that would deliver 100 kW.

b. What voltage would be needed to accelerate beam of electrons so that, at the same beam current, it could deliver the same power from mechanical collisions with the target?
Relevant Equations
##E=mc^2##

##E=hf##

##\lambda = \frac h p##

##\frac{1}{2} mv^2 = q.V##

P = V.I
a) My idea is:
1. Find the energy created by annihilation process, which is ##E=2mc^2## where m is the mass of electron
2. Find the wavelength of photon by using formula E = hf
3. Find the speed of positron by using the formula of de broglie wavelength
4. Find the p.d by using conservation of energy: ##\frac{1}{2} mv^2 = q.V##
5. Find current by using P = V.I

I am not sure at step (3) because I use the wavelength of photon as wavelength of positron. Can I do this?

b) I just use P = V.I to find V, which is the same as what I found in part (a) step (4)

Am I correct? Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Step 1 looks good. None of the rest made much sense to me. A positron is not a photon. And what voltage do you think you are finding?

After step 1, how many positrons/sec are needed?
 
  • Like
Likes hutchphd, songoku and berkeman
haruspex said:
Step 1 looks good. None of the rest made much sense to me. A positron is not a photon. And what voltage do you think you are finding?
I am thinking about accelerating voltage to accelerate the positron

haruspex said:
After step 1, how many positrons/sec are needed?
Number of positrons per second needed = ##\frac{P}{E}## where P is the power given by the question and E is the energy calculated in step 1

Next I multiply the result by charge of positron to get the beam current. Is this correct?

For b), is it correct to just apply P = V.I ?

Thanks
 
songoku said:
Number of positrons per second needed = ##\frac{P}{E}## where P is the power given by the question and E is the energy calculated in step 1
Wait, should I multiply ##\frac{P}{E}## by 2? I imagine for the annihilation process, the positron and electron will move towards each other then collide so both of them will contribute to the beam current

Thanks
 
songoku said:
Wait, should I multiply ##\frac{P}{E}## by 2? I imagine for the annihilation process, the positron and electron will move towards each other then collide so both of them will contribute to the beam current

Thanks
The electrons are in the target, not leaping out if it. Besides, you are asked for the beam current of the positrons.
 
Thank you very much haruspex
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...

Similar threads

Back
Top