Hi. I'm reading an introductory section on the Bose-Einstein condensation of a non-interacting, spinless boson gas. I'm confused by the claim that the ground state is in a coherent state with eigenvalue sqrt(N0) exp(i theta), where N0 is the expected number of particles in the ground state. The justification is that the commutator [a0/sqrt(V), a0*/sqrt(V)] = 1/V goes to zero in the thermodynamic limit V = volume goes to infinity (a0 annihilation operator for ground state). Therefore a0 acts like a complex number and so the ground state must be in a coherent state. Huh? Who asked you to divide by V anyway? Totally opaque. And doesn't statistical mechanics say the system is in an ensemble of definite particle eigenstates with probability exp(-beta*mu*N)/Z (i.e. NOT a coherent superposition of definite particle states)?? Does someone understand this better?(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# BEC condenstate thermal statistics vs. coherence

Loading...

Similar Threads - condenstate thermal statistics | Date |
---|---|

I Is there a frequency cutoff for Debye theory of capillary waves? | Feb 28, 2018 |

I Scale invariant thermal fluctuations | Apr 8, 2017 |

B Thermal and Non thermal light emission | Mar 21, 2017 |

I Thermal expansion in harmonic potential | Sep 10, 2016 |

I Planck formula and density of photons | Jul 13, 2016 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**