Behaviour of an Exponential Commutation

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the proof of Proposition 1.2 from Nakahara's "Geometry, Topology and Physics," specifically examining the commutation relation involving the operator \(\partial_x^n\) and the exponential function \(e^{ikx}\). The participant questions the validity of the transition from the established relation to the subsequent expression involving the operator \(e^{-i\epsilon \{-\partial_x^2 / 2m + V(x)\}}\). The confusion arises from the treatment of the partial derivative within the exponential, suggesting a need for clarification on the properties of exponentials in the context of commutation relations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics, particularly operator algebra
  • Familiarity with the concepts of commutation relations
  • Knowledge of exponential functions and their series expansions
  • Proficiency in mathematical physics, specifically in the context of Nakahara's work
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of exponential operators in quantum mechanics
  • Review the power series expansion of exponential functions
  • Examine the implications of commutation relations in quantum field theory
  • Explore further examples of operator algebra in Nakahara's "Geometry, Topology and Physics"
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in mathematical physics, particularly those focusing on quantum mechanics and operator theory, will benefit from this discussion.

d.hatch75
Messages
17
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Forgive the awkward title, it was hard to think how to describe the problem in such a short space. I'm following the proof of Proposition 1.2 of Nakahara's "Geometry, Topology and Physics", and the following commutation relation has been established:

[itex]\partial_x^n e^{ikx} = e^{ikx}(ik + \partial_x )^n[/itex]

The line immediately afterwards is:

[itex]e^{-i\epsilon \{-\partial_x^2 / 2m + V(x)\}}e^{ikx} = e^{ikx}e^{-i\epsilon \{-(ik+\partial_x )^2 / 2m + V(x)\}}[/itex]

I am not seeing how this follows from the previous relation, since the partial derivative is in the exponential so surely it doesn't act on [itex]e^{ikx}[/itex] in the same way? It seems dodgy, but I can only assume I'm missing some important result concerning exponentials of commutation relationships that hasn't otherwise been specified anywhere in the book as far as I can tell.

Homework Equations


(See above)

The Attempt at a Solution


(See above)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hint: try using the power series expansion of an exponential function.
 

Similar threads

Fourier Transform of Undefined Function
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Undergrad Deriving the time-dependent wave equation from Energy eigenfunctions
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Proof of Baker-Campbell-Hausdorff involving Bernoulli numbers
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Schrodinger time independent equation for steps and barriers
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Exponential Wavefunction for Infinite Potential Well Problem
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Mean and var of an exponential distribution using Fourier transforms
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Given specific v, dimension of subspace of L(V, W) where Tv=0?
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
Graduate Bloch theorem proof with V(x)=V(x+ma)
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Self adjoint operators, eigenfunctions & eigenvalues
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Undergrad Some notes on stochastic physics
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K