- #1

- 17

- 0

## Homework Statement

Forgive the awkward title, it was hard to think how to describe the problem in such a short space. I'm following the proof of Proposition 1.2 of Nakahara's "Geometry, Topology and Physics", and the following commutation relation has been established:

[itex]\partial_x^n e^{ikx} = e^{ikx}(ik + \partial_x )^n[/itex]

The line immediately afterwards is:

[itex]e^{-i\epsilon \{-\partial_x^2 / 2m + V(x)\}}e^{ikx} = e^{ikx}e^{-i\epsilon \{-(ik+\partial_x )^2 / 2m + V(x)\}}[/itex]

I am not seeing how this follows from the previous relation, since the partial derivative is in the exponential so surely it doesn't act on [itex]e^{ikx}[/itex] in the same way? It

*seems*dodgy, but I can only assume I'm missing some important result concerning exponentials of commutation relationships that hasn't otherwise been specified anywhere in the book as far as I can tell.

## Homework Equations

(See above)

## The Attempt at a Solution

(See above)