Bending moments at equillibrium

  • Thread starter Thread starter kidsasd987
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bending Moments
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion centers on the equilibrium of a prismatic member AB subjected to equal and opposite couples M and M0. It establishes that when a section is taken through the member at an arbitrary point C, the internal forces must equate to the couple M for equilibrium. Participants clarify that while bending stresses are not uniformly distributed to counteract the bending moment, the stress in each cross-section remains constant due to the uniform application of the couple M along the length of the beam.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of static equilibrium principles
  • Familiarity with bending moments and internal forces
  • Knowledge of free body diagrams in structural analysis
  • Basic concepts of bending stress distribution in beams
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the construction and analysis of free body diagrams for beams
  • Learn about the distribution of bending stresses in beams under various loading conditions
  • Explore the principles of static equilibrium in structural mechanics
  • Investigate the effects of different types of loading on prismatic members
USEFUL FOR

Structural engineers, civil engineering students, and anyone involved in the analysis of beam behavior under bending moments.

kidsasd987
Messages
142
Reaction score
4
"Consider a prismatic member AB possessing a plane of symmetry and subjected to equal and opposite couples M and M0 acting in that plane . We observe that if a section is passed through the member AB at some arbitrary point C, the conditions of equilibrium of the portion AC of the member require that the internal forces in the section be equivalent to the couple M"Could anyone provide me the proof of this? It seems little weird to me. if we applie bending moment on a beam, it would likely that each end side would experience greater moment(away from centre of mass).

How could every cross section have the same moment?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
kidsasd987 said:
"Consider a prismatic member AB possessing a plane of symmetry and subjected to equal and opposite couples M and M0 acting in that plane . We observe that if a section is passed through the member AB at some arbitrary point C, the conditions of equilibrium of the portion AC of the member require that the internal forces in the section be equivalent to the couple M"Could anyone provide me the proof of this? It seems little weird to me. if we applie bending moment on a beam, it would likely that each end side would experience greater moment(away from centre of mass).

How could every cross section have the same moment?
Have you constructed a free body diagram for the beam in this condition?

Take a segment of the beam AC as described above, put all of the forces and moments which act on AC on a diagram, and see what must happen for segment AC to remain in equilibrium.
 
SteamKing said:
Have you constructed a free body diagram for the beam in this condition?

Take a segment of the beam AC as described above, put all of the forces and moments which act on AC on a diagram, and see what must happen for segment AC to remain in equilibrium.
simple-bending.png


simple-bending.png


I understand that it will balance out but I am confused with the physical interpretation. Should I interpret this in this way, just like stress, internal force will be distributed 'uniformly to counteract the moment?
 

Attachments

  • 스크린샷 2016-08-29 9.58.56 AM.png
    스크린샷 2016-08-29 9.58.56 AM.png
    48.8 KB · Views: 627
Last edited:
kidsasd987 said:
simple-bending.png


simple-bending.png


I understand that it will balance out but I am confused with the physical interpretation.Should I interpret this in this way, just like stress, internal force will be distributed 'uniformly to counteract the moment?
Bending stresses are not distributed uniformly to counteract the bending moment, unless you mean that the stresses are distributed uniformly along the length of the beam (i.e., the stress in each cross section is the same, because the local bending moment is constant and equal to the applied couple M.)
 
SteamKing said:
Bending stresses are not distributed uniformly to counteract the bending moment, unless you mean that the stresses are distributed uniformly along the length of the beam (i.e., the stress in each cross section is the same, because the local bending moment is constant and equal to the applied couple M.)
Thanks!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K