Bending moments at equillibrium

  • Thread starter Thread starter kidsasd987
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bending Moments
AI Thread Summary
A prismatic member AB with a plane of symmetry, subjected to equal and opposite couples M and M0, requires that the internal forces at any section, such as AC, balance out to maintain equilibrium. The discussion highlights the confusion regarding how every cross-section can experience the same moment despite bending moments typically varying along the length of a beam. It emphasizes the importance of constructing a free body diagram to visualize forces and moments acting on the segment. The internal forces are understood to distribute uniformly to counteract the moment, although bending stresses may not be uniformly distributed along the beam. This clarification helps in understanding the equilibrium conditions for the member under the applied couples.
kidsasd987
Messages
142
Reaction score
4
"Consider a prismatic member AB possessing a plane of symmetry and subjected to equal and opposite couples M and M0 acting in that plane . We observe that if a section is passed through the member AB at some arbitrary point C, the conditions of equilibrium of the portion AC of the member require that the internal forces in the section be equivalent to the couple M"Could anyone provide me the proof of this? It seems little weird to me. if we applie bending moment on a beam, it would likely that each end side would experience greater moment(away from centre of mass).

How could every cross section have the same moment?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
kidsasd987 said:
"Consider a prismatic member AB possessing a plane of symmetry and subjected to equal and opposite couples M and M0 acting in that plane . We observe that if a section is passed through the member AB at some arbitrary point C, the conditions of equilibrium of the portion AC of the member require that the internal forces in the section be equivalent to the couple M"Could anyone provide me the proof of this? It seems little weird to me. if we applie bending moment on a beam, it would likely that each end side would experience greater moment(away from centre of mass).

How could every cross section have the same moment?
Have you constructed a free body diagram for the beam in this condition?

Take a segment of the beam AC as described above, put all of the forces and moments which act on AC on a diagram, and see what must happen for segment AC to remain in equilibrium.
 
SteamKing said:
Have you constructed a free body diagram for the beam in this condition?

Take a segment of the beam AC as described above, put all of the forces and moments which act on AC on a diagram, and see what must happen for segment AC to remain in equilibrium.
simple-bending.png


simple-bending.png


I understand that it will balance out but I am confused with the physical interpretation. Should I interpret this in this way, just like stress, internal force will be distributed 'uniformly to counteract the moment?
 

Attachments

  • 스크린샷 2016-08-29 9.58.56 AM.png
    스크린샷 2016-08-29 9.58.56 AM.png
    48.8 KB · Views: 608
Last edited:
kidsasd987 said:
simple-bending.png


simple-bending.png


I understand that it will balance out but I am confused with the physical interpretation.Should I interpret this in this way, just like stress, internal force will be distributed 'uniformly to counteract the moment?
Bending stresses are not distributed uniformly to counteract the bending moment, unless you mean that the stresses are distributed uniformly along the length of the beam (i.e., the stress in each cross section is the same, because the local bending moment is constant and equal to the applied couple M.)
 
SteamKing said:
Bending stresses are not distributed uniformly to counteract the bending moment, unless you mean that the stresses are distributed uniformly along the length of the beam (i.e., the stress in each cross section is the same, because the local bending moment is constant and equal to the applied couple M.)
Thanks!
 
Back
Top