Berkeley v Cornell Undergrad for Physics

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the decision-making process for choosing between undergraduate physics programs at Berkeley and Cornell. Participants explore various factors influencing this choice, including cost, academic opportunities, campus environment, and personal priorities.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that the significant cost difference between Berkeley and Cornell may not justify the additional expenses, especially considering Berkeley's strong reputation.
  • Others highlight the importance of personal priorities and the need for the original poster (OP) to clarify what factors matter most to them in their decision.
  • One participant mentions that undergrad curricula are generally uniform across institutions, implying that both schools likely offer comparable academic experiences.
  • Concerns about student loans and financial implications are raised, with some arguing that the burden of debt could outweigh the benefits of attending a more expensive institution.
  • Participants emphasize the value of visiting both campuses to gauge the atmosphere and non-academic factors that could influence the OP's decision.
  • There are mentions of research opportunities available at both institutions, with one participant noting that many physics majors at Cornell are engaged in research across various areas.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing opinions on the value of attending Cornell over Berkeley, with no consensus on which institution is definitively better. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the criteria that should weigh most heavily in the OP's decision.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge that the decision is subjective and dependent on individual priorities, which may include financial considerations, academic rigor, and personal preferences regarding campus life.

Who May Find This Useful

Prospective undergraduate physics students considering their options for college, particularly those weighing financial implications against academic opportunities.

Lambda3
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
I am currently trying to decide between Berkeley and Cornell, as the title implies. I plan on majoring in physics and attending graduate school. I am sure that there isn't a definitive answer to whether one is better than the other, so what criteria should I be looking at and what are your opinions on which is better? Berkeley would cost about $12,000 a year to attend, and Cornell would cost about $30,000 a year to attend. If I chose Cornell, I would probably have to take out a loan, so I'm not sure if that would be worth it or not.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Lambda3 said:
I am currently trying to decide between Berkeley and Cornell, as the title implies. I plan on majoring in physics and attending graduate school. I am sure that there isn't a definitive answer to whether one is better than the other, so what criteria should I be looking at and what are your opinions on which is better? Berkeley would cost about $12,000 a year to attend, and Cornell would cost about $30,000 a year to attend. If I chose Cornell, I would probably have to take out a loan, so I'm not sure if that would be worth it or not.

Coming from Cornell, I'd say probably not worth 2.5x the cost when you've got an education at Berkeley in your back yard. Unless you really want to see some snow or something.
 
They also have really good food and gyms at Cornell. And lots of space... there's 200 miles of nothing around it. Are those factors you should consider? Who knows. OP, why would you even ask this question if you have no idea what you are looking for, but one school is much cheaper for you than the other one?

Don't get me wrong; I liked Cornell. But this kind of question you can only answer for yourself after getting a hold of your priorities. If you cannot understand your own priorities, then one is as good as the other one.
 
Is this number after financial aid/scholarships? Because if it is then go for Berkeley. Ask your self what the big difference is between the two that justifies an additional $18,000. If you see good reason then go for it. Best thing to do is to google random things about them, you might not know it but things like the dorms, food service, libraries, staff, and campus environment can have a huge affect on you.
 
@cgk, upon reading my post again, I realize how vague that question is. What I meant to ask was what factors should I look at to decide which school has a better physics program, or if there is a discernible difference. I apologize for my vagueness. Were you a physics major at Cornell? If so, did you feel like you had good opportunities to get involved in research?

@Nano-Passion, yeah it is. That sounds like a good idea; I'll do that to help me in my decision.
 
Lambda3 said:
What I meant to ask was what factors should I look at to decide which school has a better physics program, or if there is a discernible difference. I apologize for my vagueness. Were you a physics major at Cornell? If so, did you feel like you had good opportunities to get involved in research?

Undergrad curricula are pretty uniform across the country. Ours here at Cornell is pretty standard in that regard, and all the classes are quite strong (assuming you take the 'honors' track). If someone from Berkeley can comment that would be great to compare, but I simply assume they have a comparable if not better program in terms of academics. But at this level, it's largely how much effort you put into it, regardless of what school you're at.

There's tons of opportunities for research here, and most of my fellow physics majors are doing research in one area of physics or another. I can't really enumerate them all there, but almost every group is open to taking in knowledgeable undergraduates. Peruse the website to see what's available! (This even applies to a few theory groups, I know an undergrad here who's doing research with a string theorist!).

If you have the chance, visit both schools. It'll give you a good feel of the place and address a lot of the non-academic concerns Nano posted about.
 
I'm an undergrad physics major at Berkeley, and although I can't really compare it to Cornell, it is extremely challenging and rewarding. I assume most undergrad physics programs at schools the level of Cornell and Berkeley are pretty similar. If I were you, I would visit both and make a decision based more on which school you like better. I was between UCLA and Cal, and ended up choosing Berkeley because I liked campus/atmosphere/people better.

Good luck!
 
Unless you really have a strong reason to favor Cornell over Berkeley the fact that Cornell costs 3x more and you would have to take out a loan I think pretty much decides for you. If you are majoring in physics and going to grad school you won't be making the big bucks anytime soon (if ever) plus school loans have become an increasingly dangerous proposition for american students: you can't get rid of them even in bankruptcy and the interest on them can become really outrageous.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
6K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K