Bernoulli’s equation for a rotating fluid

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Hiero
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fluid Rotating
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the application of Bernoulli's equation to a rotating fluid within a cylindrical container. Participants explore the implications of using Bernoulli's principle in both rotating and inertial frames, focusing on the effects of centrifugal forces and the nature of fluid flow in these contexts.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant describes the behavior of pressure in a rotating fluid, noting that pressure increases with distance from the center to provide centripetal acceleration, and questions how Bernoulli's equation applies in an inertial frame where both kinetic energy density and pressure increase.
  • Another participant asserts that Bernoulli's principle applies along streamlines and does not account for radial directions, suggesting that in a non-viscous fluid, the fluid would remain stationary despite the cylinder's rotation.
  • A later reply reiterates the importance of streamlines in applying Bernoulli's equation and discusses the derivation of the equation, emphasizing the need to integrate along streamlines to simplify the analysis.
  • One participant expresses confusion about applying Bernoulli's equation in the vertical direction in the inertial frame, questioning the justification for this approach since it does not align with streamlines.
  • Another participant suggests considering centrifugal force as a non-conservative force and mentions the role of vorticity and viscous forces in the application of Bernoulli's principle in this scenario.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the applicability of Bernoulli's equation in rotating versus inertial frames, with some agreeing on the necessity of streamlines while others question the justification for applying the principle in certain directions. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the implications of centrifugal forces and the nature of fluid flow in these contexts.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the potential limitations of applying Bernoulli's equation in non-inertial frames and the complexities introduced by centrifugal forces, vorticity, and viscous effects, which may affect the validity of the principles discussed.

Hiero
Messages
322
Reaction score
68
Consider a cylindrical container filled with an ideal fluid. Let it rotate at a constant angular speed (about the symmetry axis which is oriented vertically) and let the fluid be in the steady state.

Lets just talk about a horizontal slice so that the gravitational potential is constant. The pressure must increase as we move out from the center in order to supply the centripetal acceleration.

In the frame of reference rotating with the cylinder, everything makes sense. We have a fictitious centrifugal potential which decreases as you move from the center, and the pressure increases as you move out, so Bernoulli’s equation is satisfied.

I am confused how it works in the inertial frame. We no longer have any potential. The kinetic energy density increases as we move out from the center, as does the pressure. So how can Bernoulli’s equation be satisfied if they both increase?

What am I overlooking?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Bernoulli's principle stands along the streamlines. I do not think it does not include radial direction that you are worrying about.

Bernoulli's principle stands for non viscous fluids. If water were non viscous, cylinder rotates but water would stay still.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: etotheipi and Hiero
anuttarasammyak said:
Bernoulli's principle stands along the streamlines. I do not think it does not include radial direction that you are worrying about.
Thank you! I never learned this but I actually was considering that it only works along streamlines.

The reason I thought this is from how we derive the Bernoulli equation from the equation ##\rho \frac{d\vec v}{dt} = \vec f - \nabla P##
We must integrate over space to get:

$$\int \rho \frac{d\vec v}{dt}\cdot d \vec x = \int \vec f \cdot d \vec x- \int \nabla P \cdot d \vec x$$

Assuming the force/volume is conservative, the right side gives the (negative) change in potential and pressure, but the left side can only be simplified if we take ##d\vec x = \vec v dt ## which is to say we integrate along a streamline. Then we can use ##\frac{d\vec v}{dt}\cdot \vec v= 0.5 \frac{d(v^2)}{dt}##

I suppose since the flow is assumed steady, we can say ##[\vec v =0] \implies [\frac{d\vec v}{dt}=0]## (otherwise ##\frac{\partial \vec v}{\partial t}\neq 0## which goes against the steady state assumption) and so that integral disappears which allows us to also use Bernoulli’s equation in regions with no flow.

Thank you. I’m sure there are more subtleties but I feel I understand it better now.
 
I must say I find it a bit odd that we can apply the Bernoulli equation in the vertical direction to find the height of the surface.

In the rotating frame it’s fine as there’s no flow so we can apply it everywhere.

But in the inertial frame the vertical direction is not along the streamlines so it’s really unjustified. (Right?)

Usually it is a choice if we want to analyze things in a non-inertial frame, but in this problem is seems more like a necessity!
 
Though I am not so familiar with the topic, you may have to count centrifugal force as non conservative force, non zero vorticity and friction by viscous forces as I already mentioned in post #1 for the application of Bernoulli's principle in your case.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 48 ·
2
Replies
48
Views
5K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 48 ·
2
Replies
48
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K