Bessel function Solution to Second order ODE with exponential coefficient

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around finding the general solution to the second-order ordinary differential equation (ODE) x'' + e^(-2t)x = 0. A change of variables was attempted, leading to a transformation that aimed to express the equation in terms of Bessel functions. However, the original poster encountered issues with the solution, specifically that it included a function of t in front of the Bessel functions and only yielded half-integer orders. Another participant suggested a different substitution method to reformulate the equation into a standard Bessel form, emphasizing the importance of careful derivative handling. The conversation highlights the complexities of solving ODEs with exponential coefficients and the need for precise transformations to achieve the correct solution.
phil ess
Messages
67
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Find the general solution to x'' + e^(-2t)x = 0, where '' = d2/dt2

Homework Equations



-

The Attempt at a Solution



First I did a change of variables: Let u = e^(-t)

Then du/dt = -e^(-t)

dx/dt = dx/du*du/dt = -e^(-t)*dx/du

d2x/dt2 = d/du(dx/dt)du/dt = e^(-2t)*d2x/du2

Subbing into the ODE, I get:

e^(-2t)*d2x/du2 + e^(-2t)x = 0

And I notice that the coefficients are just u^2

(u^2)x'' + (u^2)x = 0

Now at this point I could just cancel out the u^2 and get my sin and cos solutions, but the answer wants Bessel functions, so I use the general solution to ODEs of the form:

x2y'' + x(a+2bxr)y' + [c+dx2s-b(1-a-r)xr+b2x2r]y = 0

with a=0,b=0,c=0,d=1,s=1

The solution is then x(u) = u1/2Zp(u)

With p = 1/2

Or

x(t) = e^(-t/2)[c1*J1/2(e-t+c2*J-1/2(e-t)]


But this isn't the correct answer. There shouldn't be any function of t in front of the bessel functions, and I should be getting Y's and J's of integer order, not just J's of half-integer order.

If anyone has any insights please help!

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That looks like you're not handling the derivatives and substitutions correctly. I tell you what, suppose I just write it as:

y''+e^{-2x}y=0

just so it's in the form of Wolfram Mathworld syntax for Bessel Differential equation then suppose you make the independent-variable substitution:

x=-\ln(t)

can you now then transform the DE from y as a function of x to a DE in terms of y as a function of t? Once you do that, then compare the resulting DE to the requisite form on the Mathworld site and then back-substitute t=e^{-x}.
 
Last edited:
I've tried your idea, and it looks like that's pretty much what I've been doing the whole time, so I can't see where I'm going wrong. Here's what I did:

Where am I going wrong? Thanks for the help!
 
Last edited:
Phil, when you post a real wide picture, it messes up the scrolling of the thread. You wanna' remove that please or post a smaller picture so it doesn't run off the right side of my screen? Look, how about we carefully start from the beginning in nicely-formatted latex. I'll start it for you:

We have:

y''+e^{-2x}y=0

Now let:

x=-ln(t)

then:

\frac{dy}{dt}=\frac{dy}{dx}(-\frac{1}{t})

<br /> \begin{aligned}<br /> \frac{d^2 y}{dt^2}&amp;=\frac{1}{t^2}\frac{dy}{dx}-\frac{1}{t}\frac{d}{dt}\left(\frac{dy}{dx}\right)\\<br /> &amp;=\frac{1}{t^2}\frac{dy}{dx}-\frac{1}{t}\left(\frac{d^2 y}{dx^2}\frac{dx}{dt}\right)<br /> \end{aligned}<br />

Now, can you then follow what I did and then substitute all that into the original equation in x to obtain a DE in t?
 
Your process makes perfect sense. I've arrived at the desired result! Thanks for clarifying the steps!
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K