Best edition of Jackson's Classical Electrodynamics

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the question of which edition of Jackson's Classical Electrodynamics is considered the best. Participants explore differences among the first, second, and third editions, touching on aspects such as content, units of measurement, and personal preferences.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question what is meant by "the best edition," indicating that this may be subjective.
  • One participant notes that the first and second editions include a chapter on Magnetohydrodynamics, which is absent in the third edition.
  • Another participant highlights that the third edition is more current regarding computational methods for calculating fields, reflecting advancements in technology.
  • There is mention of the third edition using SI units predominantly but reverting to Gaussian units in later chapters, which some participants find either beneficial or problematic.
  • One participant expresses a preference for the second edition due to its use of Gaussian units, which they consider superior for certain theoretical applications.
  • Another participant shares a nostalgic preference for the second edition, influenced by their familiarity with it over time, despite liking the units in the third edition.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing opinions on which edition is preferable, with no consensus reached. Preferences vary based on personal experiences and the specific features of each edition.

Contextual Notes

Participants' preferences appear to depend on their familiarity with the editions, the units used, and the content included or omitted in each version. The discussion does not resolve which edition is objectively better.

Who May Find This Useful

Readers interested in the comparative aspects of different editions of Jackson's Classical Electrodynamics, particularly those considering which edition to use for study or reference.

d.zanellato
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Hello.

What's the best edition of Jackson's Classical Electrodynamics?


Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well first of all I'm not sure about what you mean by "the best edition". Second, I have not used formally Jackson for any of my EM courses (I'm still undergrad) but I've been through some parts of the book using its second and first edition. Many of the information that I will tell you is on the Introduction part of the 3rd edition.

You see, the main difference is that the 1st and 2nd have this chapter on Magnetohidrodynamics, which the 3rd edition doesn't contain. Then there's the issue with the units, the 3rd edition uses SI units for a large part of the book (unlike the earlier ones) but returns to Gaussian units in the last chapters (you may or may not find this a good thing, depending on which units you are more comfortable with, I think).

I don't remember everything that the Introductions mentioned but you can find them all three in the 3rd edition and then judge by yourself.
 
The 3rd edition is more up to date with respect to computational methods of calculating fields. The first two editions were written before computers were widely used in electromagnetics.

As for going back and forth in units, that is a skill that any physicist needs.
 
I liked the second edition best but that might be because I had it the longest. I did prefer the units in the third edition though. I do not remember why I did not like the third edition as much. I remember the first time I took the book out of the library it was the first edition. The second edition was red; the first was green, and the third was blue. I have even heard the books described as Jackson-Green; Jackson-Red, and Jackson-Blue.
 
For me it's the contrary. I like the 2nd edition best, because it uses Gaussian units. That's close to the perfect system of units, which is the Heaviside-Lorentz system, i.e., rationalized Gaussian units used in (theoretical) high-energy particle physics.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
7K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 50 ·
2
Replies
50
Views
7K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
7K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
6K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
11K